Murder and rob for their debts with no fate, survival is the only theme they care about. This is their game rule. Their laws of survival will be challenged as well as the laws of our so-called harmonious society. Boston is driven by its own inner pursuit of a decent life to challenge the boy's standard of living, and the story starts the first wave. The sudden shock will never be accepted, just like capitalism with its ostentatious ostentation. When entering China, Emperor Kangxi insisted that his society was the kingdom of heaven. He hit Boston, and he naturally maintained his code of conduct when he met a woman driving a BMW that night.
The accident was that there was a child who had not yet been weaned in the BMW he grabbed. What kind of shock did the appearance of the child arouse in his heart? He actually chose the child and gave up the car he had given his life to grab. From this moment on he changed his life, did he change? Or return? What is his true nature? Bringing the child home, feeding nervously, and leaving friends who live together for the sake of the child, all this went on smoothly, and there seemed to be no turbulence. In this play, there was nothing deliberate.
His jigsaw puzzles appeared in the newspapers, and he blackmailed a widow at gunpoint to breastfeed the baby, a bizarre move. When all this happens to the widow, she carries both resentment and pity, in her eyes he is a special one. So, she submit to him. However, the expression in her eyes tells us that she knows something is behind the guy. She made a request to raise a child, which is amazing for someone in financial difficulty, why is she doing this? Not love for him, but sympathy? Sympathy for the child or the thug in front of you? The brief dialogue seemed to suggest a fight.
He found Boston, who was seriously injured by him, and was determined to help him complete his ideal of studying. Finally, he came to the baby's parents' home with his companions again for money. He asked for money, but he didn't ask for his life! The sudden situation caused him to shoot and kill his comrade, and thus lose his last friend, but his decision had no turning back. The woman who helped raise the child knew the reason and asked him to return the child. He showed him the home where he used to wander, several concrete pipes. Now, the place has not changed. His heirs have gone to the same place. He followed the same path, but the 10-year-old did not guard his territory with a knife, as if a few empty concrete pipes were always under threat of being robbed, and there was nothing else to rely on.
He's gone, it's time to return the child, he lost it, but he gained back the respect of a woman. He was so reluctant to hold the child in front of the house, what happened in his heart? Is it the meaning of dependence or survival? This is a movie worth thinking about. Can I explain it with the butterfly effect? But this series of questions is something I can't understand one by one.
View more about Tsotsi reviews
