logical sequence does not exist in reality, only abstract thinking gives it meaning. The circle behind it is not necessarily a fish-shaped symbol. Why do symbols have to be followed by triangles, and why are triangles arranged in dots? Only by getting these conclusions can we bluntly explain to ourselves an internal connection. Everything is messy, and our thinking tends to be arranged and understood in an orderly manner.
Trying to figure out chaos and more complex patterns leads to dead ends, like the professor who ended up mutilating himself.
If you get the movie, you know what I'm talking about.
This movie really made a lot of sense! The shooting skills of the lens are obviously intentional. The professional application
of mathematical theorems will appear contrived at first, but it is all necessary and understandable later on. Of course, I can't prove whether there is any deliberate show of knowledge, because I don't. I understand math but I understand logic, basic philosophy, and law. The meaning of the
movie is as I said above. What makes me feel very convincing and lacking in expressiveness is that the development of the plot and story is still relatively blunt. There is a common detective movie that you will see. It is told for clues. Ordinary people may not be interested in watching it. It might be okay to put it together with the lantern riddle guessing program on the evening of the festival. The two
very expressive mathematicians are naturally an old and a young mathematician. The classmates in the same study room also made a splash, but they did not help, they were used for To distract us
The role of the woman in the hospital is disgusting, and the relationship between two mathematicians, one old and one young, is unacceptable, but it can also explain the problem. These two are really alike. Destiny is the same! The wit and quick and powerful dialogue of the mother and daughter at the beginning of the film are impressive. The best actress who plays Beth can
look back at the film's best actress. In fact, this film is full of metaphors for the most natural inspiration. Logic is more useful
Just like the math student playing squash, the woman can play better than him by the sense of the body.
The regularity of squash is not as good as the sense of natural body movement
Is this a satire on the development of computer science?
In this way, the role of this woman is actually very important in this film, because she represents the illogical part of the two men themselves, and represents the part of the world's sensibility.
Detective films are like at the beginning of the film The answers and foreshadowings are revealed everywhere, and there are obstacles and confusions in the middle of the film, and the final order makes people feel that
the ! ! I really hate Detective Conan, things like Sherlock Holmes, and magic tricks, they're all just trickery, not giving you clues to see if you can figure it out. Every time I watch it, I feel like I'm being cheap and looking for the director to play with me.
The detective element of this film is naturally very strong, but it is very interesting that it is also constantly preaching against this distorted logical relationship between people and things, and the level is obviously much higher.
View more about The Oxford Murders reviews
