Of course, when I saw those buildings in the film, I was still happy and proud. The filming location in Oxford was quite concentrated, the Bridge of Sighs, radcliffe camera, sheldonian theater, blackwell's on broad street, just that one. . . However, although the interspersed and connected shots are smooth, it seems quite jumpy to those who are familiar with the land: the Russians deliberately avoided Arthur Seldom when they came out of blackwell's, Arthur threw a paper ball into the trash can at the door of blackwell's, and the camera turned By the time his footsteps turned back to his upper body, he seemed to be striding in front of the Bridge of Sighs, 100 meters away; at this time, Martin rode his bike past, was blocked by a blue car, and arrived at an unknown residence. . . Personally, I think it's not easy to do photography and editing if it's smooth enough to look like the real thing. . .
As for the film, imdb only gave 6.3 points. . . I think it's good. On the one hand, there are scenes of familiar scenes, and on the other hand, there are some truths and terminology. . . Many maths terms, occasionally a physical one, for example, Arthur compares Beth to an electron and uses Heisenberg's uncertainty principle to explain the uncertainty of its physical position, which is wonderful. . . Many seemingly profound terms cover up the truth, but the wonderful thing about this film is that it did not make a series of murders a perfect murder, but Arthur's genius on the spot, and finally "attributes credit" to the motive of the killing with the explanation of the butterfly effect. The protagonist Martin, who is so obsessed with solving the case, is wonderful. . .
So, comrades in Oxford and reading theory, take a look. . . . . .
View more about The Oxford Murders reviews
