In-depth spoilers

I thought it might be a perverted psychological criminal from "The Silence of the Lambs", but later I heard that it was produced by Sherlock Holmes's hometown, but I was a little relieved and looked forward to the type I liked. Still not up to my expectations. I happened to read a book about logical reasoning and puzzles some time ago. There are a lot of names and theories of philosophers and logicians in the movie, as well as mathematics, which I am very interested in recently. This movie is just right for me. taste, and it all comes out of this wonderful conversation between Professor Seldon and Martin. Nothing is certain to be true, nothing to be believed, the professor said. Martin said he believed in mathematics and in the evidence the eyes saw. The professor said that many are uncertain, butterflies flap their wings, and hurricanes appear in distant places, but who is the butterfly, who knows. Math can work out the trajectory of everything, Martin says, without coincidences. A lot of theoretical thoughts collide between philosophy and logic, and the subtitles flashed quickly, making me feel that my eyes and brain are not enough, and I wish there was a progress bar for me to stop and stop the playback. Of course, these conversations also hint at the psychology of the professor in the whole conspiracy to create scapegoats.
Well, let's start with the storyline, spoilers have to come.
The first deceased, the old lady, died, and my first reaction was that her daughter was the murderer. The reason is very simple. It is the director's thorough play. The film's performance has already told us that there is a tear on the face of Bass's close-up when he is holding the cello. And then there was the smile on the professor's face when she told the news of her mother's death.
The appearance of the second deceased made me play down the notion that Beth was the murderer, because no eyewitness had ever seen her appear in the hospital where the incident occurred since her mother died, falling into the trap set by the professor. There is an episode in the middle. The professor said that the most perfect crime is not a murder scene without flaws, but a scapegoat. So I fell into the conjecture of who was the scapegoat. Martin's classmate is a passerby. As soon as he appeared, I was very sure that he was not a murderer, but a common misleading trick. I had wondered if he would become one of the dead after he was later mistaken for the murderer.
The third deceased was not too unexpected. He also had a close-up during the rehearsal of the previous concert, and he looked very ill, and the murderer seemed to specifically kill people who were obviously ready to die naturally. Attention should be paid to this place. The first two deceased were sent to the door before they died. The symbols were drawn on them, and the place of death was written. This time, it seems to be an emergency, and the symbols appeared at the death scene temporarily. Made with live music.
The fourth group of deceased died in groups. This time, it is not in line with the original murderer's characteristics. The originally assumed murderer, assuming that his motive for killing was to challenge the professor, not to kill, deliberately minimized the damage. In the past, he killed people who were about to die of illness. But this time, it is a group of innocent people who are going to die. Although they are mentally handicapped children, there is no tendency for them to die in the end, so I am very confused, waiting for the truth to be revealed. Murderer bus driver, he has the motive to kill the mentally handicapped children on the bus, but he has no connection with the professor, that is, he has no motive to kill the first three people. So I'm at a loss for the plot. Until later Martin saw the German letter "circle" on the photo and the blank tissue given by the professor, he knew that it was all related to the professor. It turns out that the professor has always said that the symbols are disordered, meaningless, and appear randomly, which is always implying the truth. At first I thought his speculation was reasonable, but it seems a bit far-fetched for the old lady who insisted that Bess killed the professor to help Bess, because I can also say that the professor killed the person. Looking back on the plot later, the professor has a perfect alibi. Speaking of the alibi, I suddenly remembered that this is the first time I have seen a murder investigation without studying the autopsy report, without looking for eyewitnesses, and without reading the alibi. Especially when they found the old lady's body at home, Martin actually picked up the blood-stained pillow that was considered a murder weapon...
As the professor said, each symbol has no representative meaning, and the pattern of appearance is random, but then Coincidentally, the sequence of symbols he drew appeared in a surgical book the bus driver had read, allowing the atheist bus driver to use a series of serial killer illusions created by the professor to commit a real crime.
In the end, the conversation between the professor and Martin made me vomit blood. The professor said Martin, you are the butterfly, just because you said something about Bess, so she went to kill her mother. You are the one who started it, not me!
Your sister...
I didn't kill Boren, but Boren died because of me.
Every time classmate Martin is lying on the woman's body or falling in love with the woman, she suddenly has a flash of inspiration and finds the crux of the problem.
Highlights! The little nurse is so sexy in a naked apron! ! Beautiful boobs! !

View more about The Oxford Murders reviews