Many of the questions in that film review are explained on the Internet. I don’t know why the author didn’t read it, so I will answer his questions, mainly referring to the authors of Zhihu and Guanwang.
1. Failed scientific setting
(1): The biggest crisis in the whole film comes from the use of Jupiter's slingshot effect, and the engine stops working under the influence of Jupiter's gravity. This is a ruthless contempt for the entire geoscience and engineering community. If the various results that Jupiter's gravity will cause are not calculated or considered, there will be nothing left. Not having a plan for known issues is unacceptable. A crisis occurs only because of an accident.
Q&A:
Quoting the brain hole of Zhihu mushroom stewed chicken to answer:
Several facts can be seen from the film:
The 1.171-11 team proposed a plan to ignite Jupiter, and finally successfully saved the earth
2. The coalition government is not a straw bag, and the scientists are not bricklayers. They also proposed the ignited Jupiter plan, but the conclusion is that the success rate is 0.
3. Moss calculated from the outset that contingency plan 3 would not save Earth, nor set Jupiter on fire.
4. The final plan is that Liu Peiqiang drove the space station to ignite Jupiter and saved the earth, but also sacrificed the space station and "Moss".
5. The space station is the pilot of the earth and directly observes various data of the universe. The universe data on the earth comes from Moss.
Seeing this, you should understand. In fact, Moss has calculated that it is feasible to ignite Jupiter, but it cannot be directly ignited on Earth. You must use the space station, which means you have to sacrifice yourself, so Moss deceived the coalition government, which can also explain why The team of scientists will verify that it is not feasible to ignite Jupiter, but the plan is successful, because Moss "rebels" and provides scientists with wrong original data, of course, it is useless no matter what.
However, it is not over yet, and the biggest problem is also the beginning of the movie: "Jupiter's Gravity Sudden Increase".
Just imagine, a plan as big as the wandering earth, a plan related to the fate of all mankind, will definitely be verified repeatedly, but Jupiter's gravity is wrongly calculated, and it is so wrong that it almost destroyed the earth. Is this a hard injury, is the global scientist collectively demented? Obviously not.
In fact, Moss gave scientists wrong data from the beginning. For Moss, the priority of the fire project is higher than that of the wandering earth project! If you understand this, you can understand that Tamos' plan is to end life on Earth on Jupiter, and then implement the Tinder plan, taking the opportunity to put the space station into low-energy work, hibernate all pilots, and accidentally kill all the pilots who threaten the Tinder plan. (like killing the Russian pilot).
And one more astrophysics professional to answer:
If Jupiter is a rigid body or just a simple static fluid, the orbit of Jupiter can be accurately calculated by existing means. But the problem is that Jupiter is not a rigid body. More than 90% of Jupiter is hydrogen gas, and it is not a simple static fluid. There are huge storms on Jupiter. These two items lead to the fact that when the earth is close to Jupiter, under the action of the earth's own gravity, you don't know what kind of impact it will have on the internal structure of Jupiter. It could just be a simple ebb and flow, but it could also cause some kind of avalanche effect that would deform Jupiter in some way, and ultimately change the mass distribution in Jupiter's interior, leading to a gravitational surge. Although this possibility is small, it is not non-existent. Similarly, when the earth is close to Jupiter, under the influence of Jupiter's gravity, what will happen to the crust is also beyond our ability to judge in advance. In the movie there is a crisis of nearly half of the world's engine shutdowns. This shutdown should be a self-preservation setting for the engine. In order to predict the above two factors in advance, it is necessary to master all the internal structures of Jupiter and the earth in advance. And this is obviously impossible to achieve with human technology at the time. So it's not impossible to have a crisis in the movie. Regarding this passage, the filmmakers invited experts from the Chinese Academy of Sciences as staff advisors. So don't think too much of yourself that only you can spot the problem.
(2): Under the setting that thermonuclear fusion has been easily done, it is even possible to dig stones to engage in thermonuclear fusion. Driving a truck is actually a very good skill, and there is no automatic driving assistance, which is unacceptable.
Q&A:
Not to mention how frequently the map needs to be updated on the surface of earthquakes and blizzards at any time, nor how high the AI required for autonomous driving needs to be developed, all resources are devoted to the black technology of re-fusion engine, and liberal arts and art are compressed to Are extremes, autonomous driving, and assisted driving so necessary to develop? The basis of autonomous driving is navigation. First, the ground base station navigation has no resources to lay and maintain. Secondly, GPS and Beidou satellite orbits cannot avoid the interference caused by the plasma of 12,000 planetary engines, and how many satellites are there in the constantly changing orbit of the earth. Survive? The earth relies on the Forerunner space station to maintain global communication, and it also drives automatically.
(3). There is no equipment spare parts warehouse built near the engine, and it has to be transported by trucks for thousands of miles, which is unacceptable.
Q&A:
I didn't say that there is no spare parts warehouse for equipment near the engine~ It's just that the spare parts warehouse is not for production consumption, but to avoid losses caused by geological hazards. Do you think global earthquakes and plate movements are child's play? Keeping spare parts in place will not break them together? Aren't you afraid your eggs will all break in one basket? Do you understand that it is sent to saturation rescue from other places with less damage? In the movie, the protagonist team was not delivered and the engine was restarted successfully, which is likely to be the spare parts in place.
Another issue in the original book stems from the rebel setting. Of course, the author who failed the test must be ignorant of this.
Again:
The planetary engine is a re-fusion technology, and the true face of the flint is likely to be a miniature nuclear bomb. It is very reasonable to centrally manage the storage of flint.
(4) There should be a well-organized dungeon, and you can get out of the black market and get an identity card. This setting may be okay to fool foreign audiences. In China, you need to swipe your ID card to get on a high-speed train, and face recognition online. Chinese audiences are completely unacceptable.
Q&A:
Not only is it as simple as making an identity card, but when making a fake identity card, the image data and identity information of the characters are replaced. It's explained in the movie here.
(5). Artificial intelligence can actually be ignited. There is no internet connection and no data backup. The artificial intelligence can be killed by burning the camera. Such settings are completely unacceptable.
Q&A:
Smashing a wine bottle on the camera is just to set fire. Behind the camera is the MOSS server and other hardware devices. The main server cannot connect to the data after burning data. At this time, the AI can still work. This kind of black technology is developed by the pickers. In the movie, the background sound of "the core node is lost" is 80% ignored or not understood by the pickers.
(6). The shock wave can push the earth away at a speed of Mach 1000, and the earth can still maintain its basic structure, which is unacceptable.
Q&A:
The shock wave generated by the detonation of the ignited Jupiter's atmosphere is Mach 1000. Where does the movie say the speed at which the earth is pushed away?
A simple middle school physics formula Acceleration caused by acceleration to the earth a = the thrust of the shock wave / the mass of the earth.
Our earth is pushed by visible light at the speed of light every day. Isn't the broken ball still revolving around the sun steadily, but is it pushed away by the speed of light?
(7). People push people hard to resist something. Is this the setting of internal force transmission in martial arts films in the 1970s? Can it be used in sci-fi movies?
Q&A:
First of all, tension resistance and compression resistance are two different things. Look at how much pressure is required to crush a piece of paper with flat pressure, and how many times the pressure is the force required for pulling and breaking?
Second, it is the artificial exoskeleton that pushes and presses, not the glass heart.
The above is a simple answer to the author's incomprehension of the plot setting. It can lead to the discussion of so many setting problems of the serious "Failed" author. I think it is also the success of the setting of the Wandering Earth movie, otherwise you let him explain why " Why does the Wakanda high-tech in Black Panther disappear, and the high-tech talents have to fight closely? The existence argument of Thor's teammates in the Women's Federation? The author of "Fail" will vomit blood for you to see!
2. The script failed 4. The values failed
The protagonist sneaked into an area unsuitable for human existence to avoid his father and went home...and then brought his sister...and was not ready...and kept saying that this was a genius... Does the crew have anything to do with geniuses? Misunderstand?
Q&A:
This is because the length of the movie was requested to be deleted. There is a scene in Hangzhou District. A group of people are going upstream under the frozen lake. Before the deletion, the plot was that my sister went to Hangzhou to find her parents.
As for the protagonist saying that he is a genius, I don’t think the protagonist is young and arrogant. If a young man speaks righteously and sternly to the camera, we must be fully prepared before acting. Isn’t this more incompatible?
There are also humanistic issues such as kindness and values, which are funny to me. When the population is halved and earthworms are used as gifts, you and I who were born in a peaceful age are not qualified to discuss.
After writing here, I found that there is nothing to continue to say. The author who failed to pass the full text reveals two words: ignorance.
What is the pass line, and you can't show this standard generously. You talk to him about science, and he will talk to you about humanities. If you talk to him about humanities, he will turn around and talk to you about science.
So, I'm just a fighter, I have no big reason, I have no professionalism, and I have no right to speak. I'm not good enough to play word games with such professionals.
But, I have movie ticket money. I don't watch all the literary and marginal films that you guys are touting. "The Wandering Earth", I not only watched it, but also watched it several times, and even had to pay my own money to bring my family and friends to watch it together. Starve to death these drop book bags, the world will be clean.
PS:
The plot will wait for the director's cut version. In order to cater for the Spring Festival, the original three hours were reduced to two hours, which led to the direct setting of the rebels, the reason why Duoduo went out, why the team doctor took the initiative to smash the flint, the captain cares about Duoduo's safety, etc. The plot has been deleted.
The subjectivity of acting is too subjective to say. In terms of special effects, it is only equivalent to the level of "2012" 10 years ago. The special effects company said that it can do better, but there is not enough money and time, and there is still a lot of room for improvement.
Saying this is not to justify the shortcomings of the small broken ball, but to dislike the author who failed to pass. Because of ignorance, he is fearless, but this can also explain what you said. Good works can be demoted by unqualified authors. It's not worth it, why can't the Chinese who love the small ball and have contributed more than 3 billion box office to blow it up?
To paraphrase the words of military enthusiasts, I would like to hang the book bag for the unqualified author and say: No matter how bad Chinese weapons are, they are used to protect you, and no matter how good foreign weapons are, TM will use them to beat you!
To paraphrase Premier Zhou's words again: the people like it and you don't like it, how old are you?
PPS:
Transfer from Zhihu user: still like it
Can Wandering Earth be criticized?
Of course! Everything can be criticized.
The Wandering Earth does have many deficiencies and flaws. If you think this movie is not good, you can point out that you don't like it, and make it clear that some aspects need improvement, and then it doesn't matter if you give it a star according to your preferences. This is criticism in the conventional sense.
Even if you say that you give one star because of Wu Jing, that's fine. I sometimes see movies starring traffic stars such as yy and wyf, and the upper limit of the rating is basically automatically changed to two stars. There is not much difference between the two behaviors.
But to criticize this, you still have to pay attention to the Basic Law. If you don't like it, you have to give reasons why people think that you are not nonsense. The so-called words have something. Criticizing because of a disgust for a certain factor is already the boundary of criticism, and anything beyond this boundary cannot really be regarded as criticism. It's as if you were evaluating a dish: You said that this dish is good in all aspects, but the unreasonable nutritional mix makes it difficult to absorb and needs to be improved. This is criticism. You said that this dish was not cooked properly, the meat was not rotten enough, and the vegetables were a bit jerky, which was disappointing. This is criticism. You said that there is too much salt/sugar/vinegar in this dish, which is not the taste you imagined, ruining the mood and not delicious. This is also criticism. You said that this dish contains coriander that you don't like the most, and you can't eat it at all, and it's hard to swallow. This is barely a critique, and the inability to accommodate everyone's preferences can be regarded as a disadvantage (although there is basically no such thing as accommodating everyone's preferences).
But you said that when you saw the restaurant's food picking and returning with your left hand, you criticized the dish as garbage. ? ? ?
What's more, I am not happy because there are too many people commenting that it is delicious, so I have to criticize it for being unpalatable. ? ? ? I really can't recognize you as a critic of this kind, because it's obvious that you're talking nonsense.
When discussing a matter, it should be normal to maintain a relatively reasonable state with subjective emotions, otherwise wouldn't it be nonsense, wouldn't it be a gangster without brains to say something ugly? In addition to pointing out shortcomings and deficiencies, criticism is often accompanied by an expectation that the things being criticized will become better. Obviously, such emotions do not exist in gangsters and brainless blacks. I don't think this is criticism, but if you have to call it criticism, I don't think it's acceptable.
But it's useless to say so much. The gangster and the brainless black always hold high the banner of "May XXX be treated kindly by this world" when they see what they like being criticized by others, and use the guise when they see the praise they hate. The slogan "Praise is meaningless if there is no criticism" is a strange combination of yin and yang.
All are general colors.
View more about The Wandering Earth reviews
