The complex technique of Renai's video narrative structure is so advanced that ordinary people like me can only admire it. I haven’t read Duras’s original work, but from Resnais’s film, my understanding (definition) is a causal narrative technique with time as the axis, and time is the past and the present (it actually also vaguely points to the The future..), the cause and effect lies in a complex but broken logical structure of the narrative itself, whether it is the war fragments of the land of Hiroshima (a traumatic history remembered by time), or the relationship between the present and the A certain anxiety in the future (actually a game based on moral instinct and true love on an emotional and spiritual level) also contains a memory of the past (respective memory, reality, emotional level), I will sort it out for the moment It is a revolutionary film language of video literature style, script psychology style, and causal style (but disturbing the figurative linear logic). The structure and technique are the same as last year's in Marienbad, except that this one is slightly lower than the latter in my opinion. It is determined by the use of the image as a whole and the depth of the content at the overall level, and it is also an explicit and implicit relationship. It was decided that this one was actually more explicit, it explained more completely, Marion Bard was more concise and more implicit, and it had more room for open interpretation. In general, no matter how complicated the structure and technique are, the content is actually quite pure. When the emotion is based on reality (extramarital affair, etc.) and history (war trauma memory, etc.), the spirit is lost, and I don't know what to choose from... Image 95 100 points for script, 95 points for director, 95 points for performance, 95 points for innovation, 96 points for works, 0.95 points for content coefficient, 91 points for film history
View more about Hiroshima Mon Amour reviews
