As a child I threw myself on the full Sherlock Holmes collection and watched it three times. Digging out the legends of modern and ancient times, just to read the biography of Di Gong in the Tang Dynasty, the mystery novels from half a century ago were more exciting than the Di Renjie legend of CCTV's case by half a century.
There is a story in Sherlock Holmes called the dancing little man. Sherlock Holmes deciphered the password from the frequency of the password and the actual frequency of the use of English letters. He also deduced the travel experience of the visitors from the stains on the clothes of the visitors. According to Di Gong's biography, a prisoner drilled a hole in the roof beam directly above the stovetop of the victim's house, filled it with the poison, sealed it with wax, the victim's house set fire to cook, opened the lid of the pot, steam rose, and The sealing wax melted and the poison dripped into the rice cooker. A great story has an unforgettable magic.
As a result, I have developed a careful mind, which is manifested in remembering the way the packaging bag is knotted, the direction of the folds, reasoning based on the degree of wear and tear of the numbers, and opening the lockbox at home with a snap. I just want to applaud for my arrogance in pushing intellectual quotient.
But insignificant this piece is a complete mess in terms of micro-reasoning design. Studying crime strategies in a crowded bar, going to the victim’s house without a weapon to collect extortion money, disposing of the body in a septic tank without knowing whether the victim is alive or dead, sitting at the crime scene and calling an accomplice, all gloves Without it, the blood stains could not be wiped clean, the corpse was left with trails, and the victim was put into the trunk as a dead person and ran away halfway without knowing it. The three criminals were like brainless flies, and they were all going to prison. The death point of rice.
But the director's ambition is not here. He is not here to show off how delicate his face is, but just to show how strong his body is. So their clumsiness was saved one by one by a coincidence of death. The victim himself was a criminal who was committing the crime. The policeman who wanted to run away fell to his death, and the victim who was running for his life in the trunk was hit and killed, and came to arrest the criminal. The agent is a greedy thief, and all of them fulfilled the sentence that the mantis catches the cicada and the oriole. Everyone's weakness has become a reminder, as if to create a spell that Skynet is sloppy and not leaking.
There are many kinds of coincidences. One is O Henry's "The Gift of the Magi". The husband sold a watch and bought a hairbrush for his wife. The wife sold her long hair and gave her husband a watch chain. The other is my elementary school composition: I Dad bought a newspaper, and by chance I bought the same newspaper. Coincidence is the same coincidence, and coincidence sees high and low.
Insignificant is just a coincidence that is better than natural decoration in the macro. It seems like a greedy and stupid bird who is unintentional, and extortion has escalated into a serial murder. All of them are not fuel-efficient lamps, but all of the crime art is under fire, and then mixed with black humor with tight plots and no preaching, such as serial sets of you and me, and they match each other seamlessly.
What is especially commendable is the ending. After the protagonist asked about the ingredients of the poison, he drank it happily and immediately became suspicious. It seemed that the heroine who had the last laugh met another ruthless character who had been rendered for a long time.
How evocative.
View more about Big Nothing reviews
