This is a bad movie with a vague script and ambiguous ideology, it must be.
But after reading a lot of people's comments on the movie, an interesting topic came to mind - the twist between morality and good and evil.
On the moral level, we see a conflict between basic notions of good and evil, professional ethics, and friendship allegiance.
In terms of good and evil tendencies, we have seen people's choices in the so-called "right and wrong".
In my opinion, all the nonsense of brotherhood and loyalty is a bluff, and in essence, it is nothing more than a basic logic of "be good alone or follow the trend of evil".
Many people say that the male protagonist killed many innocent people. Who
is innocent except the old tramp who was sprayed to death by that fool?
Brother loyalty may sound like chivalrous, righteous and courageous, but the congenital short-sighted behavior of benevolence, righteousness and morality at the expense of others' safety is not what friends should do, and the question of how to be worthy of others' lifelong gambling is an open-ended question. Topic, who gave so many bullshit pretending to be loyal buddies so much capital to engage in moral judgment?
In mainland China, are there still few social phenomena similar to such a chaotic pseudo-moral ideology? Everyone seems to have the right to talk about the high housing prices, the corrupt officials, and the unscrupulous businessmen, but which pretentious judge will be morally sound when placed on the trial stand? Or let's not talk about it so much, whether it is a developer who makes huge profits, a pilgrim official or a local boss who runs a business, which one is the bad guy born? When making a decision, who is not under the pressure of supporting the family, instigated by the loyalty of brothers, and unable to extricate themselves in the quagmire to the other side?
When the confusion between good and evil has become a social tradition, "adherence to principles" and "last minute awakening" have actually become important elements in the formation of monsters. What kind of bullshit logic is this?
Personally, I really think this is an extremely disgusting social ethos and behavioral logic, where thieves judge robbers, and prostitutes laugh at prostitutes. Don't complain about the poisoned milk powder, the building is crooked, and if you are the ones who make the decisions, will you do better than anyone else? It's unbelievable that a group of little people who are surfing the Internet with pirated Windows and full of pirated software have any fucking qualifications to engage in moral observation.
View more about Armored reviews
