It seems that I have been watching movies related to "reality and reality" lately. The idea of wanting to watch this movie came from the movie essay collection of Europa that I watched the day before yesterday, which mentioned this movie.
Many people say that Europa's film review collection is actually a collection of essays, and his film reviews are mostly written from life, talking about the relationship between images and life. I think maybe that's how I like to write reviews. Movies, in many cases, evoke certain memories and create more possibilities for life. Just when I was thinking about the value of being an "observer" who doesn't always get noticed but often observes others, I came across this film by Ou Rong. From the writing practice that started with homework, the fascination with prying caused by the lack of love, from the writing with feeling to the experiential creation, the boundary between literary creation and real life seems to be getting narrower and narrower. The inner desires are turned into words, and the flames of desire become more and more prosperous, so that in the end, it is impossible to distinguish what is real and what is false, what is life and what is fantasy. Some people say that this film is an introductory guide to literary creation, which is just like its Chinese translation - how to achieve the best situation in writing and achieve the effect of "entering the room". Through it, it seems that life is the beginning of art, and the desire caused by artistic creation further creates life and expands the possibility of life. I've heard a saying before, and to this day, it's the reason why I like watching movies - "Because of movies, we learn more about life's possibilities." The same is true of literary works, which point to infinite possibilities in the process of writing. This yearning, like the desire to pry at the beginning, is to discover stories and then create stories. The reason I like this movie is also because the interpretation of the content can be extended indefinitely. I prefer to interpret this film as a video work that explores the boundary between art and life. In this light and shadow magic, in fact, the audience has not realized which is the story itself and which is the content of the boy's novel in the story. This kind of indistinguishable virtuality and reality, this kind of tension that is intertwined and unpredictable at the end, forms the driving force for appreciating works of art. Many times I think that what distinguishes an artist from ordinary people should be his excessively fanatical desires. At the same time, he also uses other places to make up for certain lacks in his own life. Just as we fill the emptiness and tiredness of life through novels and images. There are different stories behind different windows in a building. In the process of imagining these back stories, they may become the inspiration for artistic creators, or it may be to fill the real regrets in the imagination. And I think I have also found the answer to the question I was wondering. In reality, an obscure and slightly withdrawn "observer" may become a novelist who writes bizarre works with the help of others. I would like to believe in the end of the story, The teacher and the boy have become a body, becoming thousands of "observers", "perceptors" and "writers" with a flame in their hearts. In the chapters of life and works of art, they wrote countless "A suivre (to be continued)".
View more about In the House reviews
