The film takes literature into play, but itself becomes a literature, both in the soundtrack and in the structure, it can be called a masterpiece of art. First of all, at the beginning of the film, the grid composed of the faces of high school students from more to less, constantly changing faces, attracted me, coupled with the tight and irritating soundtrack, the title of the film appeared at this time, "Dans la maison". The film has always adopted the method of simultaneous display of monologue and picture description. On the one hand, the monologue of the boy's article is matched with the life of the Raphael family, and on the other hand, the teacher's interpretation of the article is matched with the life of the teacher's family. It seems that there is no intersection between the two. Families, in fact, have long been inextricably linked. The monologue is paired with just the right amount of music, and one can't help but worry that the boy will be caught spying on him. In addition to the content, I think this is also one of the reasons for the success of the film. The shooting, editing, and post-production soundtrack are all natural. There is no doubt that the plot setting of this film is impressive. First of all, the boy peeked into the life of the Raphael family, and wrote a composition based on this, which caught the teacher's attention. The teacher who is a fan of literature is gradually unable to extricate himself, and he is quietly peeping at the life of the Raphael family through the boy's article, and of course the teacher's wife. Although he is morally condemned, he still cannot restrain his inner prying into other people's privacy and his evaluation of other people's lives. Secondly, the teacher knows that the article is real, but also thinks it is fiction. Just like all masterpieces, there must be contradictions and characterizations. Interpret the boy's real life as a literary work and tell him how to write it. So the boy did as he did, reflecting the literary works into real life, and the teacher became the initiator of all the plots invisibly. If there is a murder, then the teacher is equivalent to instigating a crime. In the end, this film feels real and fake, unreal. The boy's article comes from life, but does it really happen? Not really. It all started from his desire, perhaps due to the incompleteness of the family, he had an instinctive longing for other people's families, so he chose the Raphael family for "field research". On the one hand, the film actually performed the plot, on the other hand, the teacher said it was fictional; on the one hand, the boy wrote the plot, and on the other hand, he changed the plot, but it did not actually happen. True and false. Maybe everyone is a script in someone else's hands, because of one sentence, your life changes. Just like the fate in "I Have a Date with Zombies 3", a book records the whole world, and one sentence records all the actions of a person at a certain time, and a slight modification is another ending. Maybe movie audiences are also screenwriters, like "The Truman World", thinking that someone dies, maybe he really dies. One side is the real world, and the other side is the fantasy of the real world, and sometimes even oneself is stupidly unclear. This even reminded me of "Criminal Minds", a serial killer who confuses the real and the fictional. After killing people, he creates literature without knowing it, thinking it is just the plot of a novel. The boy was peeping Raphael's life at first, "Fantasy" and "design" their lives, but I didn't expect that in the end, the teacher also became his design and a part of his literary works. Like marionettes, they put on a good show together. The boy is the director, who personally planned and acted in this play, and the teacher is the guide, who guides the direction of the plot. They regard life as literature, and constantly use practical actions to change it, making it contradictory and conflicting, and finally let them end and find the next work by themselves. At the end of the film, it is fixed in a building, which is filled with all kinds of people, and each window has its own story, shooting, lust, family and so on. Life is only known to you, others can only imagine. But everyone can enter the life of others, integrate into it as a third party, treat it as a literary work, create it, create a climax and create highlights, and finally create an ending, and leave silently. The teacher always thought that he was instructing the boy to create, but in fact he was the one being instructed. There are two obstacles for the boy and the teacher, the teacher himself and his wife. There is always an excuse for approaching a teacher, just like an excuse to tutor Raphael in math, unfinished literature is the best excuse. After successfully attracting the teacher's attention, it's time to start creating the plot. The Raphael family's voyeuristic literature is nothing more than a gimmick, using him to create inconsistencies in the work and resolve obstacles in the way of boys and teachers. The teacher steals the test paper and becomes the same plot maker as the boy, co-creating works. This is the first step in solving the obstacle and bringing the status closer. By the end of co-creating other people's lives, it can be said that all obstacles have been solved, and the teacher's wife has also left. The whole movie shows a voyeuristic look at the Raphael family, but it is also a cheesy happy ending story. What the movie doesn't show is that the boy uses this cheesy story to enter the teacher's life. As for the ending of this story, To be continued. . . Go, treat it as a literary work, create it, create a climax, create a point of view, and finally create an ending, and leave silently. The teacher always thought that he was instructing the boy to create, but in fact he was the one being instructed. There are two obstacles for the boy and the teacher, the teacher himself and his wife. There is always an excuse for approaching a teacher, just like an excuse to tutor Raphael in math, unfinished literature is the best excuse. After successfully attracting the teacher's attention, it's time to start creating the plot. The Raphael family's voyeuristic literature is nothing more than a gimmick, using him to create inconsistencies in the work and resolve obstacles in the way of boys and teachers. The teacher steals the test paper and becomes the same plot maker as the boy, co-creating works. This is the first step in solving the obstacle and bringing the status closer. By the end of co-creating other people's lives, it can be said that all obstacles have been solved, and the teacher's wife has also left. The whole movie shows a voyeuristic look at the Raphael family, but it is also a cheesy happy ending story. What the movie doesn't show is that the boy uses this cheesy story to enter the teacher's life. As for the ending of this story, To be continued. . . Go, treat it as a literary work, create it, create a climax, create a point of view, and finally create an ending, and leave silently. The teacher always thought that he was instructing the boy to create, but in fact he was the one being instructed. There are two obstacles for the boy and the teacher, the teacher himself and his wife. There is always an excuse for approaching a teacher, just like an excuse to tutor Raphael in math, unfinished literature is the best excuse. After successfully attracting the teacher's attention, it's time to start creating the plot. The Raphael family's voyeuristic literature is nothing more than a gimmick, using him to create inconsistencies in the work and resolve obstacles in the way of boys and teachers. The teacher steals the test paper and becomes the same plot maker as the boy, co-creating works. This is the first step in solving the obstacle and bringing the status closer. By the end of co-creating other people's lives, it can be said that all obstacles have been solved, and the teacher's wife has also left. The whole movie shows a voyeuristic look at the Raphael family, but it is also a cheesy happy ending story. What the movie doesn't show is that the boy uses this cheesy story to enter the teacher's life. As for the ending of this story, To be continued. . .
View more about In the House reviews
