1.30 Supplement: There is a science that believes that earthquakes and various natural disasters will occur strictly according to a certain mathematical law, and even use research mathematics-to be precise, a number game-to predict earthquakes. This method is called "commensurability theory", and its founder is Weng Wenbo, an academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Academician Weng made outstanding contributions to petroleum exploration in his early years, and according to Hudong Baike, it has predicted many earthquakes at home and abroad today. I am very skeptical of the "commensurability theory". This theory has nothing to do with earthquakes, it simply adds and subtracts some year numbers. A reporter took the book "Prediction" written by Weng Wenbo and showed it to He Zuoma, an academician of the Institute of Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Li Miao of the Institute. Both of them held a negative attitude. If there is enough data, we can find any pattern we want. For example, the biblical code. Someone used the Bible as a string game, looking for a combination of letters in a specific location that could correspond to major events in the world, and claimed that this is the Bible's prophecy for future generations. The problem is that these "predictions" can perfectly explain what has happened, and when it comes to predicting what has not happened, there will be no such good results. The key is that there are many characters in the Bible. If you look carefully, especially with the help of a computer, you can always find anything you want. In this spirit, I suggest to make a "Mao Zedong Code" and look for the permutation and combination of Chinese words in the standard "Selected Works of Mao Zedong". You may "discover" all the major events that have long been predicted in China. (Books: never expected)
Speaking yesterday, I think the ending of Terminator 3 is quite interesting. Of course, when I watched it, I was still wondering why the protagonist trusted a robot to say "it is destined to happen" so much. I couldn't figure it out. If I really caught up with the time and inserted a crystal into it, wouldn’t it be possible to stop Skynet? ? The pleasure of watching a movie is to put yourself in an "overhead world", this world has its own "rules", but the audience can't help but use "common sense" to judge or even analyze the success or failure of the movie when watching the movie— -Based on the audience's own analytical logic. The fun of the ending of Terminator 3 is to point out that things happen largely randomly. It is not that you kill a person, and stop a virus to end the problem. The same is true for the "Skynet team", it is not a kill. Connor can control the earth. Starting from Terminator 1, large sections of truth are permeated in the narration. To be honest, I am not useful, let alone the truth, but this is also where the fun lies. You always have to chat with the movie. In my mind, the ending of Terminator 3 and the T-800 sentence "I killed you" can make Terminator 3 score higher than Terminator 2. As for the loopholes in Terminator 3, there are too many, I won't enumerate them one by one. The two "cops and robbers" dramas alone are enough for me to be distracted to play a small game.
View more about Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines reviews
