The complete timeline is written like this: The
three otakus were drinking at the bar, and the fat man tore off the paper in the notebook to write a letter of protest against Hollywood. As everyone knows, on the back of the paper, a whim of one of the three was written.
After the three met Casey, the time traveler, they also traveled through the time rift in the toilet for a series of time and space shuttles, and finally entered the not-too-distant future world.
Time travel editor Millie finds them, brings them back to her own time, and kills them.
The note that recorded the whims was discovered, and the three became famous (there is no reason to believe that the whims must have something to do with the invention of time travel).
This is the normal timeline. The key point is that all events are interrelated and there is no future change due to time travel, because all these are inevitable and interlocking.
The problem is that the big man who didn't die in the end destroyed the note that recorded the whims with water, forming a paradox, so everything went back to the beginning. This setting is actually very painful, but if it is not like this, there is no way to jump out of the inevitable. of fatalism.
Therefore, any problems that are designed to time paradoxes cannot be solved, so people have to use parallel worlds to explain. Every time a paradox occurs, only through a new parallel world is generated, and the old world is not affected. , to be resolved.
Personally, I think all the explanations are nonsense, and the existence of the paradox just shows that time travel is impossible.
Alright, is this movie? Aside from the plot, the ending is rather lousy, and it is quite comedic. Like the bottle opener...
View more about Frequently Asked Questions About Time Travel reviews