Incorporating poetry and melancholy into the film is the "stylization" of all Laota's films. This Ivan can be discussed from two aspects. 1. Significance in Film History and the Old Tower Collection. 2. The meaning of the film itself. The first point: this is Laota's pioneering work. Unlike other masters who have been exploring, Laota's first film has already established the proportion of "poetry and dreams" in his films. How to influence a person, I have always believed that there are two points, one is the family, and the other is the loss. Laota's father is a poet. The blood of Lao Laota's "poetry" flows into his son Laota's body. Instead of a pen, his son uses film, which is really a great luck in film history. This film, from the perspective of the lens, uses a large number of empty lenses in the dream, and the lens is pushed and pulled to create a psychedelic. Dreams are illusory, and reality is cruel. The second point: the film itself is actually not that good. It’s just that everyone watched other films, chanted a sentence of nb, and then looked back at this one, and then realized that this film was so good. The biggest flaw in this film is the scheduling of little Ivan. The role of little Ivan is not good as a whole, and the acting is embarrassing in many places, and some dramatic performances are abrupt. To put it bluntly, too much force. (On this point, I would like to praise the little master of long-distance running with 400 strokes~) You always talk about poetry and the distance. Laota began to tell you in the 1960s that the distance of poetry is to fly into space to find it.
View more about Ivan's Childhood reviews
