A decent film

Rupert 2021-12-09 08:01:20

Well-deserved movies. King Kong has been remade countless times. It can be traced back to 1933. I remember that it was introduced in a episode of the Central 6 program. It was said that horror movies became more popular when the economy was depressed. Is this a horror movie? Maybe it was that era.
It's not as good as the King Kong shot in 2005. Although the special effects model is much better, the thickness of the plot is much worse.
There are always incompatible primitive contradictions between giant monsters and humans. Unknown creatures need living space, while humans need dominance. Only monsters locked in cages can be allowed by humans. In the past, we always felt that human beings were selfish, arrogant, and hypocritical. This point of view is also reflected in the movies. When I was young, I felt that those selfish bad guys deserved to die. But with the increase of age, the angle of seeing things is no longer single.
It is difficult to say who is right and who is wrong. The aborigines need a living environment. It is not right for us to disturb them. From a moral point of view, human beings are immoral. But in terms of survival instinct, seeing threatening things naturally produces aggression. Not only humans, but who can see huge monsters must first try to communicate, and who can let the unknown creatures sleep beside their pillows. . The soldiers are right. Sometimes there are no enemies, and people always give themselves imaginary enemies. The lieutenant said that professional soldiers have the responsibility of soldiers, and need to sacrifice himself to protect the safety of the people of the country, but he is blinded by hatred, and he will go his own way if he does not listen to dissuasion.

View more about King Kong reviews

Extended Reading
  • Anderson 2021-12-09 08:01:20

    The genre narrative is very skillful, and the visual map of primitive wildness and industrial civilization is presented in opposition, which is quite warning of the dramatic expansion of industrial civilization, but it is a breakthrough in industrial production to have such proficiency in special effects in the 1930s. On the other hand, Peter Jackson's version of "King Kong", apart from the special effects (hardware facilities) and the emotional impact of "human and animal love" on this basis, there is almost no major rewriting. The old version is still strong.

  • Olin 2022-03-20 09:01:44

    The three versions (three versions) of King Kong have been read, and the storyline framework of the 2005 version is basically the same as this 33-year version. I remember that the storyline of the 76th edition that I watched a long time ago was a bit innovative.

King Kong quotes

  • Jack Driscoll: Aw, they're just up to some of their evil tricks.

  • Ann Darrow: How many potatoes do you think you've peeled?

    Charlie: Me go back to China, never see no more potatoes.