I was fortunate to watch this film, which made my narrow-minded heart wider. The film features gay indulgence to disease, Ned's initiation, and the committee's insistence. However, it cannot be said that the homosexuality and AIDS patients that the film mainly emphasizes need social acceptance and recognition, and whether we should also take safety measures to avoid AIDS. However, the director did not pierce this point, and did he want the audience to realize it?
I don't judge the government's handling in the play, the position of other social groups, because if it is, I may be one of Yunyun too! All the current laws and regulations, what should a person be, how should he live, and what kind of achievements should he have... This is a conclusion forced by some people in the society at the beginning. Is it the most correct, not necessarily, not necessarily all Yes, we are just habitually bred to perform. Therefore, at any age, you must get married, and you must have children after marriage. Parents must give their children the best education. It must be the man who spends money on the woman (I am a woman), and it must be heterosexual to be healthy. must……
Let's think about:
1. Why is there homosexuality? The general problem is family problems, school problems, social problems.
2. Homosexuality is correct, but there must also be safety measures, and do not maliciously harm people of any gender.
3. What should we do in society, because this is not someone else's business, but the responsibility of the whole society. Just like the second half of the film, if the problem is not solved, it will only snowball bigger and bigger.
This movie needs more people to know. May more people get justice, or more justice. Not just gays, but others! A good film and television work is sometimes better than a book!
View more about The Normal Heart reviews
