When I first saw it, I didn't think so. The expression of many philosophical thoughts in the character's heart in the novel cannot be presented in the film.
After reading it for a while, it feels a little different from the taste of the novel.
The text is more imaginative, abstract, and divine.
The live-action performance makes the characters, ideas and philosophies originally floating in the world of ideas come into reality.
I'm not looking for the above to be practical. It doesn't matter when it's actually implemented. That is, found his and her eyes.
He and she must exist as some kind of entity. In fact, no matter how illusory and abstract.
The film restores this reality.
Performances by Daniel Day-Lewis and Juliette Binoche settle the buoyancy of Kundera's work. The characters that seem to be absent in the text are fixed and clear.
thomas.
A top brain doctor.
erotic man.
Loyal and loving husband.
Politically independent.
Personally upright.
Kind and brave.
It reminds me of how insignificant the indulgence or stoicism of one's physical life is in the tragedies of the great age.
But Teresa took Thomas, into the pastoral, into death. This also shows that no matter how vast the tragicomedy of the times is, personal persistence in emotions and thoughts still participates in the design and influence of life.
Isn't Sabina also living the way she chose.
lived. Go straight. love. die.
View more about The Unbearable Lightness of Being reviews
