"Life and Death" after watching

Ashtyn 2022-09-08 12:29:40

I watched the first episode on the sleeper train at night and saw some want to cry in the back. There were too many people in the car, so I had to hold back.

"Life and Death" discussed at least three questions with us.

One, why is Carl attracted to Danny?

Second, in an intimate relationship, can the body and mind be separated?

Third, what is the way out for a marriage relationship that is both beautiful and divorced?

The first question, in the context of "Fight for Life", first of all, people have comparable levels of feeling of different pleasures. There must be a kind of sexual pleasure, which is better than ordinary orgasms.

That is comparable to three things, physical orgasm, sensory (vr) orgasm, and mind-body orgasm.

In the story, the screenwriter uses the inversion of gender as a conflict point, as if to say that things are better in psychological sense, and its completion is only in the game of virtual experience. (However, their first kiss in the game is very abrupt and unprepared, which seems strange.

Why is pure sensual pleasure better in stories than body-mind integration?

It's easy for me to think of a lame reason for the question, since he won't be bothered by the trivialities of life.

But why is it so unpleasant that the trifles of firewood, rice, oil, salt, and garlic are so unpleasant.

Love to drink water.

Love is vitality.

The sex when Danny and Theo met was also intense and beautiful. And then, eleven years later, what else can I say?

Besides Carl, after Danny and Carl were cut off, Carl couldn't complete it in reality, and he didn't feel it with others in the virtual game. Carl falls in love with Danny in the game. In the play, Carl is a relatively simple person. If Carl is a heterosexual who deeply loves his girlfriend but is not married, or a scumbag who is emotionally determined, the plot will be more three-dimensional.

Carl is an ordinary bachelor in the story. He has no fetters, and it's hard to see that he has feelings for Danny in the first place.

All of this happened suddenly and strangely. It's the kind of person who made a decision and then discovered a whole new world. Carl surprised himself when they kissed for the first time.

For Carl, the psychological pleasure is better, precisely because he is a very simple person. His behavior seemed a little sloppy. It's too easy for him to follow his instincts.

The interaction mode of "Life and Death" is completely different from the interaction through the network today. The above idea is to equate the virtuality of the story with the virtuality of today's reality, and it will be a little off topic. But if we don't bring the scene back to reality, our thinking about the story is of little significance, right?

I tried to bring the scene in the story to the reality of the current technological level, and found that Danny's fascinated desire was definitely not an object of online dating, but a perfect living lover who could actually interact in reality. Carl is his perfect lover in the play.

This perfect lover, first of all, has done everything perfectly, can be seen at any time, separated at any time, has great physical strength, and has no requirements other than sex. Second, and equally important, you must be perfect in the eyes of the perfect lover. That is, to achieve this double perfection can be called a perfect lover.

Such a lover exists only in fantasy. (If there is, please give me a dozen.

second question.

I think it's still the "cuteness" that Uncle Jt talked about in "Yin Yang Tune".

That is, we can play cats and dogs for hours without getting tired, but how cute can he be alone, and I can play with him for hours without getting tired?

In this big environment, what can be done? It is impossible to separate the body from the mind.

Everyone is not a saint, and everyone is not cute enough.

Third question.

The way screenwriters show us is an open relationship.

An open relationship is good when it is fulfilled, and bad when it is assumed that this intimate relationship will not get better.

The second question and the third question are somewhat similar.

The first is to separate the mind and body, and then use the detachment of the senses as a way out.

The days went on, the children continued to be born, and they didn't struggle with each other.

…………………………………………………………

We are all looking forward to a better life, but at the same time we are all disappointed in life, and we cannot make changes and efforts to make life better in the first place. We are exhausted by the trivialities of life, the pressure of work, the bodies of our elders, and the achievements of our children, and our hearts are like an island.

Everything is always sweet in the beginning, and the heart is full of excitement and hope.

Really, if five years, ten and fifteen years can be as beautiful as ever, what is there to regret in this life?

View more about Striking Vipers reviews