Before the first episode, I nagged and clicked "→" many times. In fact, the last thing I want to see is that the two of you are good (too rotten to me), the ending is not quite like the style of Black Mirror, and there is no unexpected feeling.
There are still some details worth mentioning in the second episode:
1. The name "Shard" Internet Company. Smartphones are now fragmenting people's time. The name satirizes that today's Internet companies are increasingly invading people's attention, and time is becoming fragmented, affecting people's deep work and study.
2. When the incident happened, the founder of Fragment Company was on vacation without technology. Isn’t it also a satire of the current Internet technology’s harm to people?
3. Through data analysis (the hot word "big data analysis"), Fragment Corporation has obtained information about the kidnappers earlier than the police, satirizing that our privacy is a joke in front of Internet companies.
4. Fragment Company claims that personal accounts belong to individuals and are private property, and even relatives cannot transfer them to relatives due to the accidental death of the account owner. However, behind the plot, the Fragment Company has full control of the male protagonist's information, which is really a great irony. If artificial intelligence is added to accurately analyze the purpose of the male protagonist's kidnapping, the plot may be better.
5. The highlight of the whole play is after the shooting. For the great events in the male protagonist's life, under the online social media, there is a "di" notification, and people do what they should do after a glance. Let's try to reflect, is the notification message of the mobile phone really so important?
Episode 3: Haven't watched it yet.
View more about Striking Vipers reviews
