In fact, the whole film seems to be well done, and there are also many fighting scenes, typical action films.
But the plot is too old, the protagonist's performance is too rigid, as if it is a morbid performance, the action and the The sound effects are not harmonious and coordinated. Perhaps this is the director's desire to restore the authenticity of the action, but the whole play is not real. Quite unsatisfactory. There is no courage, and it is a state from low to high. All performances have no characteristics. The
movement is a continuation of some Western routine performances, and does not show the real Tai Chi, a fatal blow, since it is used Such a reverie routine. I don't think this is what Westerners like to watch.
So this can be said to be a failed film. First of all, without a good script and without a good director, this has already failed for most of the time. But these actors are all auxiliary effects, the action is in great contrast with the two characters of "Tai Chi" in the title Bunsen, and a character of chivalry is added. Where does chivalry come from? A practice of Tai Chi, In order to protect his sect, he became distorted, and then personally destroyed the reputation of his sect. In the end, the person who wakes up is called a chivalrous person? Contribution.
This can only be seen as a vulgar revenge film. The whole film is too bland, as if it has not been guided deeply, and is directly spliced with a few shots. The focus is on the title and its own plot. The structure can't be connected. I
can only pass the time and look at it!
View more about Man of Tai Chi reviews
