The arm can't twist the thigh

Zoe 2022-04-23 07:03:33

The average person will definitely fall asleep watching this film. You have to watch this kind of film with your heart and with your conscience.

First of all, this P thing will definitely not happen in China. The media in China is an entertainment industry, and it will not be involved in this topic. Even if there is, it is inspired. We all know the virtues of journalists in China. If you have money to do things, get out of there if you have no money. There are only two types of people who believe in the media, one is low-IQ, and the other is brainless.

Pull away, talk about movies. In fact, I was wondering if the informant was not the child, would she be so persistent? Her principle is not to leak the informant or not to hurt the child. At the end of the movie, she asked such a question, which made me feel a little uncomfortable. , What is the purpose of a hero created by the feature film who defends the principles of journalists?

At the end of the movie nothing but the truth, I really want to add so what?

The arm can't twist the thigh, it's the same in Laomei, we Chinese people must be self-aware

In addition, I saw Rose from Friends again, it's not easy, it's a pity Played as an ungrateful badass. . .

Let's share a line:
A man can live a good life, be honorable, give to charity, but in the end, the number of people who come to his funeral is generally dependent on the weather.
When the weather changes, you What to do?

View more about Nothing But the Truth reviews

Extended Reading

Nothing But the Truth quotes

  • Ray Armstrong: [staring at his wife's new story] You made the top page!

  • Alan Burnside: [In front of the Supreme Court] In 1972 in Branzburg v. Hayes this Court ruled against the right of reporters to withhold the names of their sources before a grand jury, and it gave the power to the Government to imprison those reporters who did. It was a 5-4 decision, close. In his dissent in Branzburg, Justice Stewart said, 'As the years pass, power of Government becomes more and more pervasive. Those in power,' he said, 'whatever their politics, want only to perpetuate it, and the people are the victims.' Well, the years have passed, and that power is pervasive. Mrs. Armstrong could have buckled to the demands of the Government; she could've abandoned her promise of confidentiality; she could've simply gone home to her family. But to do so, would mean that no source would ever speak to her again, and no source would ever speak to her newspaper again. And then tomorrow when we lock up journalists from other newspapers we'll make those publications irrelevant as well, and thus we'll make the First Amendment irrelevant. And then how will we know if a President has covered up crimes or if an army officer has condoned torture? We as a nation will no longer be able to hold those in power accountable to those whom they have power over. And what then is the nature of Government when it has no fear of accountability? We should shudder at the thought. Imprisoning journalists? That's for other countries; that's for countries who fear their citizens - not countries that cherish and protect them. Some time ago, I began to feel the personal, human pressure on Rachel Armstrong and I told her that I was there to represent her and not her principle. And it was not until I met her that I realized that with great people there's no difference between principle and the person.