The Conflict Between Upholding Journalism Principles and Journalists' Personal Sacrifice

Brooke 2022-04-22 07:01:42

The film "Truth Comes First": Shows the contradiction between adhering to the principles of journalism and the journalist's personal sacrifice.

Journalists who spoke out were exempted from criminal imprisonment. To say or not to say?

Regardless of whether the informant is an adult or a minor, in the eyes of journalists, they are all indiscriminate informants, regardless of their social attributes and social relations, no matter who provides important news information, the professionalism of journalists Under the request, they should firmly protect the right of concealment of intelligence personnel, and at the same time maintain the trust relationship between journalists, news media, and intelligence personnel.

Reporter Rachel's journalism is very principled. It has nothing to do with the protection of the little girl's motherhood, and has nothing to do with the pursuit of the Pulitzer Prize for journalism.

In addition, the film also insists on the supervision of the news media, which restricts the power of those in power in the government, so the press is called the "fourth right" in the West. Powers are checked and balanced, and there will inevitably be conflicts and conflicts of interests.

If journalist Rachel, faced with the outcome of her imprisonment, chooses to protect herself, her marriage with her husband, and her son's reunion. Correspondingly, what she sacrificed was the trust between the news media and the public and intelligence personnel, the truth and concealment principles of journalism professionalism, the binding force of the news media on government power, the sacrifice of society fairness and justice for more people.

View more about Nothing But the Truth reviews

Extended Reading
  • Patsy 2022-03-16 09:01:05

    "With the passage of time, the power in the hands of the government has penetrated into every corner. These people in power, regardless of party or affiliation, only want to make themselves immortal, and the people are the ultimate victims." Excellent, everything is good. But I think there is a surprise at the end, but it is not amazing. There is room for discussion, and the soul of the movie is lost in half. After reading it, I deeply feel that power is a luxury.

  • Danielle 2022-03-28 09:01:07

    "A man left his family to go to prison to protect the principles, and they named a public holiday after him; a man left his children to fight a war, and they erected a monument to him. A woman did the same. She's a monster."

Nothing But the Truth quotes

  • Ray Armstrong: [staring at his wife's new story] You made the top page!

  • Alan Burnside: [In front of the Supreme Court] In 1972 in Branzburg v. Hayes this Court ruled against the right of reporters to withhold the names of their sources before a grand jury, and it gave the power to the Government to imprison those reporters who did. It was a 5-4 decision, close. In his dissent in Branzburg, Justice Stewart said, 'As the years pass, power of Government becomes more and more pervasive. Those in power,' he said, 'whatever their politics, want only to perpetuate it, and the people are the victims.' Well, the years have passed, and that power is pervasive. Mrs. Armstrong could have buckled to the demands of the Government; she could've abandoned her promise of confidentiality; she could've simply gone home to her family. But to do so, would mean that no source would ever speak to her again, and no source would ever speak to her newspaper again. And then tomorrow when we lock up journalists from other newspapers we'll make those publications irrelevant as well, and thus we'll make the First Amendment irrelevant. And then how will we know if a President has covered up crimes or if an army officer has condoned torture? We as a nation will no longer be able to hold those in power accountable to those whom they have power over. And what then is the nature of Government when it has no fear of accountability? We should shudder at the thought. Imprisoning journalists? That's for other countries; that's for countries who fear their citizens - not countries that cherish and protect them. Some time ago, I began to feel the personal, human pressure on Rachel Armstrong and I told her that I was there to represent her and not her principle. And it was not until I met her that I realized that with great people there's no difference between principle and the person.