Personal opinion, don't spray if you don't like it

Giles 2022-04-21 09:02:59

In the movie, many people went to Venezuela to investigate the truth. Only the second woman thinks that the assassination of the president has nothing to do with Venezuela. As far as the president is concerned, he must choose the investigation report given by the majority. In addition, there is no evidence that the investigation report of the second woman is the truth. So it's not a political scandal, in fact the female lead can handle it better. The foreign policy of any country has two lines, explicit or implicit. Sometimes a country makes a certain decision, and the other country takes advantage and secretly loses (premise: if the decision is made public, the other party will be alert), a reporter accidentally learns If the so-called truth is released, how much damage will it cause to the country? If this reporter exposes a senior official or president of the country, the prime minister’s corruption, the scum of a certain project, or even exposes the country’s human experimentation with its own people, I will admire him, but any country has an overt or covert foreign policy. , some are impossible to get what is said on the surface, these need to be cautious

View more about Nothing But the Truth reviews

Extended Reading
  • Lee 2022-03-26 09:01:10

    Before I saw the ending, I had the urge to give 5 stars. It not only involves the rights and obligations of people in the news media, but also sees the changes in everyone's life under national security politics, while at the same time realizing the realization of family and women's rights. I was very relieved to see this film on the 12th Press Festival. It's best to give the movie 6 stars when you see the ending! The film with the long ending gives the impression of lingering voices. The world is complicated, it's too hard to stick to anything

  • Katelyn 2022-03-27 09:01:14

    The struggle between national security and the First Amendment, the struggle between politics and the law, women's rights, public opinion monitoring, media independence, how to continue to uphold their principles in a lone battle that is no longer supported by family and society...

Nothing But the Truth quotes

  • Ray Armstrong: [staring at his wife's new story] You made the top page!

  • Alan Burnside: [In front of the Supreme Court] In 1972 in Branzburg v. Hayes this Court ruled against the right of reporters to withhold the names of their sources before a grand jury, and it gave the power to the Government to imprison those reporters who did. It was a 5-4 decision, close. In his dissent in Branzburg, Justice Stewart said, 'As the years pass, power of Government becomes more and more pervasive. Those in power,' he said, 'whatever their politics, want only to perpetuate it, and the people are the victims.' Well, the years have passed, and that power is pervasive. Mrs. Armstrong could have buckled to the demands of the Government; she could've abandoned her promise of confidentiality; she could've simply gone home to her family. But to do so, would mean that no source would ever speak to her again, and no source would ever speak to her newspaper again. And then tomorrow when we lock up journalists from other newspapers we'll make those publications irrelevant as well, and thus we'll make the First Amendment irrelevant. And then how will we know if a President has covered up crimes or if an army officer has condoned torture? We as a nation will no longer be able to hold those in power accountable to those whom they have power over. And what then is the nature of Government when it has no fear of accountability? We should shudder at the thought. Imprisoning journalists? That's for other countries; that's for countries who fear their citizens - not countries that cherish and protect them. Some time ago, I began to feel the personal, human pressure on Rachel Armstrong and I told her that I was there to represent her and not her principle. And it was not until I met her that I realized that with great people there's no difference between principle and the person.