no Zuo no Die

Marlen 2022-04-20 09:02:10

The biggest feeling after watching "Truth Comes First" is that the heroine would rather endure the pain of prison than reveal the source, not to defend the rights of the revealer or the principles in her mouth. The source of all these tragedies is that she wants to suffer. The vanity of concern and the lie of guarding the original source of the news are not the reasons for Wei Guangzheng.

All are victims, and all think they are doing the right thing. Everyone is for the truth, but no one knows the whole truth. The heroine and Cia don't know the truth, thinking that the government is using power recklessly; In the end, everyone was at peace.

In a word, it is all made by the heroine herself. It is really ironic that the heroine starts a dialogue with her son.

View more about Nothing But the Truth reviews

Extended Reading
  • Ansley 2022-03-20 09:02:19

    There are many golden sentences: A man can live a good life, be honorable, give to charity, but in the end, the number of people who come to his funeral is generally dependent on the weather.

  • Cary 2022-04-24 07:01:17

    Good movie. As a journalist, you should have such an attitude. It is inevitable to pay a price for your own principles.

Nothing But the Truth quotes

  • Ray Armstrong: [staring at his wife's new story] You made the top page!

  • Alan Burnside: [In front of the Supreme Court] In 1972 in Branzburg v. Hayes this Court ruled against the right of reporters to withhold the names of their sources before a grand jury, and it gave the power to the Government to imprison those reporters who did. It was a 5-4 decision, close. In his dissent in Branzburg, Justice Stewart said, 'As the years pass, power of Government becomes more and more pervasive. Those in power,' he said, 'whatever their politics, want only to perpetuate it, and the people are the victims.' Well, the years have passed, and that power is pervasive. Mrs. Armstrong could have buckled to the demands of the Government; she could've abandoned her promise of confidentiality; she could've simply gone home to her family. But to do so, would mean that no source would ever speak to her again, and no source would ever speak to her newspaper again. And then tomorrow when we lock up journalists from other newspapers we'll make those publications irrelevant as well, and thus we'll make the First Amendment irrelevant. And then how will we know if a President has covered up crimes or if an army officer has condoned torture? We as a nation will no longer be able to hold those in power accountable to those whom they have power over. And what then is the nature of Government when it has no fear of accountability? We should shudder at the thought. Imprisoning journalists? That's for other countries; that's for countries who fear their citizens - not countries that cherish and protect them. Some time ago, I began to feel the personal, human pressure on Rachel Armstrong and I told her that I was there to represent her and not her principle. And it was not until I met her that I realized that with great people there's no difference between principle and the person.