A person is different from others by having different principles. Ordinary people, without clear principles, often have different choices in different environments, and they will be vague and confused. As a result, people with firm beliefs can be called "amazing".
The reason why a great man is great is inseparable from his principles. The core of his personality is those principles that cannot be abandoned. It was those principles he adhered to that made him who he was.
This is a simple equivalent substitution understanding of "people are the principle".
However, when Burnside said this at this time, the meaning did not stop at praising Rachel.
The deeper meaning is to throw out the concept of "people are principles".
From the perspective of a person, as mentioned above, a person's personality consists of the principles he adheres to. And when used as an object, such as in Burnside's perspective, at first I thought he represented Rachel, not a principle, but later found that the two were the same.
In other words, it will be well understood.
For example, everyone is discussing what exactly is Rachel protecting?
Is she protecting specific people? Are you still upholding professional ethics?
My answer is: both.
Protecting informants is adhering to the principles of this profession. Both are the same.
People are principles.
By extension, what makes a democratic government a democratic government? That is to say, each specific person is protected. The ultimate end of every principle, every constitution, is a concrete individual.
Taking human rights as the foundation should be the highest principle of a government.
.
View more about Nothing But the Truth reviews
