The fact that such a film can be made proves that the country has this awareness; for those countries that cannot make such a film, it can only be said that it is either unconscious, or tacitly admits that this system exists and does not want people to know about it. At the current level of moral development, the unconscious state is almost nonexistent. We can see such countries everywhere.
Everyone is doing his job, everyone, whether it is positive or negative, everyone is working hard for the work they are doing, so this is the end. When we feel injustice for reporters, do we really need to reflect further, and what led to this ending? Is it just because of her persistence, her uncompromising?
The news media has the right to report, but when faced with events that touch the entire system, this is often the most sensitive time. If it is handled well, the media will become famous and go down in history; if it is handled badly or treated coldly, it is the individual and individual institution who are unlucky. In such an unequal confrontation, the latter has almost no chance of winning.
Just as the First Amendment cannot stand against national security, what kind of balance is needed between national interests and morality?
View more about Nothing But the Truth reviews
