Questions asked should be discussed

I went to the screening of Sky Killer today, but there was a problem with the source of the film. When playing, the audio and video were out of sync, so I switched to playing Innocence; this is probably the third time I've watched Innocence, and I can find out more by watching it repeatedly. But in the discussion that followed, an audience member asked: Without knowing the historical background of shelling, what did this movie tell us? Immediately, I and the others present were left speechless. Indeed, the discussion just now was set around the historical background of Attack in the Shell, so for those who are watching this movie for the first time, this movie will of course be too mysterious. On the way home, I thought about this question carefully, and the answer I came up with was: the will of human beings to exist as an individual is a kind of selectivity for the external environment. In the movie, in the police station, the aunt's words about the limitations of people were identified. Tokusao and Bart were talking about riding Motoko in the car. Finally, the little girl shouted that she didn't want to be a puppet. The three made a string about consciousness and consciousness. The main line of choice.
In Genesis, it is said that God created man in his own image. Is this consciousness inherited from man? Create a puppet in the image of a human being? Before God created man, he could not inquire about human consciousness. He thought that our birth was chosen according to the consciousness of our parents, and we could not make our own conscious decision. The problem is not the choice of individual consciousness, but the problem of the individual encountering the other's desire for self.
Looking at the historical setting of Attack in the Shell, we know that Motoko was paralyzed at the beginning and then self-consciously wanted to accept the most advanced prosthetic surgery at that time, but generally such a high-tech product is like the Internet back then. The first is a militarized product. The experimental application of the prosthetic body was first realized on the battlefield, which led to the appearance of Bart's beloved Major; but as Bart said, the official only cares about the memory of Moko, not life and death. The GHOST who cares about that body, when Motoko encountered the second choice, she chose to merge, so as to get rid of the shackles of the other's desire for the self, and the opportunity is only one time, so Bart and Tokusao They will all become social beings manipulated by invisible hands like everyone else.
The comparison between the words of the appraisal aunt and the girl shows different understandings of the existence of consciousness. The former relies on theory, while the latter speaks directly. I don't want, that is, I refuse, I don't want that way, and it's also a direct manifestation of consciousness. Although God did not ask whether man was willing to be created, after being created, man should still thank God for this compulsive desire, at least in some respects, God is good. The girl has her self-conscious choice direction, although in the setting of the story, the carrier of the human being, that is, the original human body is no longer comparable to the artificial prosthetic body in all aspects, although the prosthetic body can reach a kind of non-aging, The fact that it is easy to care for and easy to change, but as one of the carriers of GHOST, the consciousness of choosing a carrier should depend on the GHOST itself, not the superiority of external things.
So I think as far as the film innocence is concerned, it is a suspenseful criminal investigation animation with consciousness as the outer shell and selective as the internal cause, haha

View more about Ghost in the Shell 2: Innocence reviews