Because it is really very, very beautiful, and some thinking about transposition, it is still worth five stars. Compared with the previous film, the beauty in the lens is still more beautiful, but it is not so tragic and confused (that is, the beauty of emotional beauty and atmosphere), and it is more and more clear. In addition, it's not good or bad, just some messy thoughts when reading: 1. Regarding the Chinese background, it is similar to the starting point urban novels, but all of them take place in Japan. Is there such a reason? Bad things happen in other countries, even in the context of a country with a lot of hatred, which is not only conducive to passing the trial, but also more acceptable to the audience. How can bad things and bad desires not exist? It’s just that it’s not recognized. At this time, a layer of film must be constructed. 2. Regarding the matter of human memory transfer mentioned in it. I'm also thinking that human beings' DNA instinct is to reproduce and leave something behind. After human beings have freed their hands to think about some mysterious things. This reproduction does not only refer to biological, in fact, it can also be spiritual. What human beings want to leave behind, so the rest of life is to always carry their own memories into reality, through various forms, such as music, painting, architecture, literature, etc., to beautify them for others to appreciate (beauty is to shock people. the means of human emotions and ultimately remaining). In the end, human civilization is actually the spread of emotional memories created by human interaction for countless years...
3. The amount of information about the creation. Is it really suitable for the art of film, which is a fleeting glimpse, to place a lot of information that needs to be thought carefully in a shot that will flash quickly? If it is a book, we can control our own reading speed (that is, the speed of information flow), but in a movie, a lot of philosophical thoughts, famous sayings, and metaphors that need to be thought about are packed in a limited time, and only half of the speech is said. The unfinished meaning of the story, including the complex and radiant beauty of this article, I think it is also worth thinking about information, all of which are stuffed in one head... Reminds me of the piles of words that flashed in the moment when the pseudo-story or something.. . Is it also too trusting in the untapped level of information processing/subconsciousness of the human brain? It's fine if the information doesn't mean what it means, but the problem is it means ah. Movie theaters only show it once, it's not like art for movie theaters, like for DVD tapes that can be paused over and over again. Is this also an attempt to develop more people with personal projection equipment in the era? I don't know, anyway, I'll be a little tired, puzzled and even hypnotized (although the picture is beautiful, I can't just rely on the picture to grab my attention)
4. When the line is broken, it falls flat
Which movie used this phrase first?
View more about Ghost in the Shell 2: Innocence reviews
