Feel free to write something, after reading it, the film is not long but a little tired.
The expectation for it is to continue the gorgeous and delicate rendering and hints of the upper part, to continue the love of Basu, and to continue the details of human touch. I like to be relaxed and sweet, and dare not look at the heavy.
When I looked at it, I found that Bart showed his skills. It turns out that the robot girl is not exactly his opposite. The killer who deliberately creates a rigid and soft impression is closer to the puppet than the previous one, and also returns to the local religious symbol.
When I saw the old woman, I was a little bit poked, and sympathized with the robot. There is a bit of humor in Togusa and Bart's play. Togusa is a bystander, a contrast, and one of the bearers of nothingness, but I don't pay too much attention to what role Bart is. It feels like Bart is a little...so a little...ooc.
The image of Bart in the last movie was brought out by Motoko. This movie starred Bart and probably has a dog to reflect what changes he has undergone.
Three in and three outs, the idea is strange, I feel scared by the director's arrangement... Is the meaning of the role of Togusa just to reveal nothingness?...Is nothingness exaggerated, who is not responsible and role To escape from nothingness, I hope the future will not be as lonely as the film renders.
The expected farewell of Basu was disturbed by the words of the rescued little girl. Will the inside of the child really be different from that of humans? Probably not, but the child will reflect what is in people's hearts. But I still don't understand the plot, why did I not notice any relevant clues before kidnapping the child, and I was too energized by the gorgeous background and murdering puppets...
In the end, the vegetarian food was still eaten.
But what Bart is thinking in the whole movie is really difficult for me to understand, and even Togusa is thinking.
View more about Ghost in the Shell 2: Innocence reviews
