What qualifies as a "human"

Valentina 2022-04-21 09:03:01

I watched 8 episodes in one go, and I first watched it for the sake of appearance and beauty contact lenses (it seems that I am really a superficial baby = ̄ω ̄=). Later, the more I saw it, the more I liked it, and the discussion on AI was more in-depth than what I had seen before. (In other words, the handed down Xiao Zhengtai is really cute 0.0)
I really like what Leo said to Karen, "You are the same as us, you have the tenacity of Fred, the darkness of Niska, and you still want to know new things, Just like Maxine...you still care about other people, like Mia.", I think Karen started to no longer darken at this time, and I was so happy to see her and Pete at the
end ⊙ω⊙.
In other words, if AI is really realized and robots have our human emotions, but they cannot have basic human rights in this society, have we returned to a slave society? But is the emergence of sentient robots a mistake in the first place, a misuse of an otherwise limited resource, and a need to be eliminated? I guess it all comes down to what exactly is our definition of a "human", is a sentient robot a "human", and can every synth in the show be counted as a human? Of course not, so can Mia be considered a human being? Maybe some people say yes, she has her own independent consciousness, emotion, and love. But she and other synths that we don't count as human beings are just an extra piece of code. With this code, can they be considered human? The existence of life should be sacred originally, but with the advancement of technology, we can also simplify life into a piece of code. Will the life created in the laboratory be regarded as inherently inferior, or will the normally generated life be regarded as inherently inferior or genetically inferior, just like in the movies of the close call?
As for the flash drive that Niska got at the end, I haven't watched the second season yet, I'm looking forward to hee hee 0.0

View more about Humans reviews

Related Articles