Before watching "Peter Rabbit", I read the evaluation first. Well, the feeling at the time was that it is a story of a rabbit who is selfish, loves to destroy, and is not suitable for children to watch. I was a little embarrassed and left a serious negative impression, and I don't plan to watch it. Until this chance to read it again, I found that it is not as serious as the comments said. After reading it in person, I feel that this is a story of a rabbit child.
First of all, I am sorry to analyze this story dedicated to children from an adult perspective. But I always felt like I had to write something for the adults who read this story.
Just started the conflict between Peters and Uncle McGonagall. It was a joyful grief, Uncle McGonagall invaded their home and killed Peter's father. Peter teases and steals from Uncle McGonagall. Here I don't think who is right and who is wrong, but their positions are different. And from Peter's point of view, how can the hatred of killing the father be alleviated by this? This scene ends with Uncle McGonagall's bad habits leading to death. Here I still want to hug this lost parent, take on all the older brothers, and mourning the passing of Uncle McGonagall.
The second clash between Peters and McGonagall. First of all, Peter and their party "overturned" Mag's future home and brought huge trouble to Mag. This is the beginning of why Mag hates them. I don't think Peter and the others are wrong here. Uncle McGonagall invaded their home, and now that they're gone, the home is back, as Peter said, manage it well, but have a party to celebrate before that. So the conflict here is still a matter of position.
The climax of Peter and McGonagall's conflict is triggered by McGonagall's fall in love with Bey. (We can already see that Mag is a good person who is cold on the outside and hot on the inside.) Peter did not provoke Peter because of personal reasons. Made all kinds of very bad behaviors to Mag: electric shocks, bedside traps, allergies.... It makes people feel very angry. Seeing this, I feel that Peter is the combination of the most annoying bear children! And Bey reminds me of the mother of the bear child, including the saying of the bear child mother: "He's just a rabbit (child) ah, what can he do!" Fuck your child, fuck your rabbit Bar! This completely detonated my anger at the bear children all these years. I have to say that when I saw Peter detonate his own bomb, destroying his and Bey's home, I felt very good inside, deserved it! Made it myself!
In the end McGonagall sold the house back to London, while Bey was about to leave, Peter stood talking to Benjamin as they stood on the ruins of their home. It was this conversation that turned my anger away from the previous one. He should have been a better older brother, but he's just a kid, overwhelmed by the loss of his parents, and attached to Bey as his mother, making him do these terribly wrong things. He is fundamentally different from those bear children. The bear child is because of the connivance and pampering of his parents, while he is helpless and confused because he is growing up. I think what would I do if I stand in his point of view? With a heavy burden on my shoulders, my only reliance may be gone. I might be crazy too.
In the end, Peter and Benjamin tried their best to get McGonagall and Bey back. Together they opened a toy store.
This is a great story for kids and parents to read together. I've always felt that we've gone too far in teaching kids not to make mistakes. We want to tell them not to make mistakes, but also to tell them how to face them correctly when they make mistakes. The case of Yao Jiaxin is the most distressing. It was wrong for him to hit someone. If he did something wrong, he should take responsibility and try his best to make up for it and send the victim to the hospital for emergency treatment, instead of covering up his mistake. And Peter was telling the kids that?
View more about Peter Rabbit reviews
