Disaster

Augustus 2022-04-20 09:02:10

This is basically very difficult to wash, it is to designate 70 to that three people to live together, that is, after the defeat of the army, the three people live together, and the tinea pedis in the future, why is the tinea pedis in the future? At that time, the store was actually 50 wrong. Now, don't watch it later, I'll go to the audience at that point, you won't feel stupid, even the moment when the three of them are very harmonious together, they disappear from the beginning, they are already a god, what are you talking about later? The group, it's just the disappointment of this woman, the diverse narration is not important anymore, I fucking want to see it right now, just three people living together happily, I think it can be achieved, I don't think the queen is queen It's the missing parts in the back. The mouth has a possibility in the open relationship of those good days. We have seen it. I think the script of this movie has completed all the tasks.

View more about Jules and Jim reviews

Extended Reading
  • Heloise 2022-03-30 09:01:06

    Is the combination of two men and one woman the new Eden of the French in the 1960s? There is no debauchery, but casual behavior, as if the whole cultural atmosphere is like this. She wanted to create an alternative ideal of love, a parallel practice of pacifism (feminism, communism). As in these utopias, "we play with the source of life and fail," and, like Jules, the simple and the ardent will live on.

  • Dayne 2022-03-30 09:01:06

    Good shot, but a little bit unbearable

Jules and Jim quotes

  • Catherine: Are you hurt? Then I'll stop being hurt. We mustn't ever both suffer at once.

  • Jules: [voice over] But it was not allowed

    [Last lines]