Just came out of the screening hall and sat down in the hall.
I plan to write a good review of the movie.
Let's take this movie seriously.
Filmed in Australia, it is only shown in Australia, and it is a new work by Martin Freeman. I bought tickets early and prepared to go to the cinema.
I remember seeing Martin's interview some time ago saying that this is not a zombie movie in the strict sense. In fact, I have basically never watched zombie movies (except "Train to Busan"). Listening to the recommendations of classmates and watching genre films, I found that the purpose of watching zombie films is nothing more than to have a good time, have a meal, or relieve stress... It is inevitable that it means "zombies for zombies".
In this work, however, this element is only used as an auxiliary aspect. The relationship between characters, the plot, and the audience's perception depend on the whole 48hr corpse transformation process to promote. I think this idea is very good. Of course, everyone will say that this is the idea of the short film, and the film is just an expanded adaptation of the short film (after watching the short film, it will be reviewed later). But I think the introduction of another father-daughter line is not superfluous. Instead, it establishes a mode of opposition and balance to avoid the plot being too monotonous (in fact, there is a third father who is not very strong, and the triangle is the most stable ⊙ ﹏⊙)
I can give 85 points for this extended rewrite.
Insert a sentence:
Tommy's father turned around and bit the stick, which was the most touching point for me 〒_〒
I saw a lot of comments saying that the expanded work is too thin and the plot is too bland. It suddenly reminded me of "Manchester by the Sea", which won the golden statue last year. The two films made me feel very similar. Both of them were watched in the cinema. When I go, I always think about:
I'm so full of emotions, the director quickly come up with a big move!!!! I will definitely cry, and then I will be moved, even if it is not real, even if it is a fancy show. As a result, the movie ended without a few tears.
This is probably the intuitive feeling that this kind of realist work brings us. It’s too bland, too bland. Maybe you won’t applaud when you watch the movie, but when you turn your head and think about it, life is not like a blockbuster. Wasn't that interesting. If we enter the same situation, there must be such dialogue.
But if you don't follow the rhythm all the way, it may be difficult to capture the climax of a certain emotion.
This kind of work has really too high demands on the audience - not only does it require you not to be distracted throughout the process, but you also have to calm down and put yourself into the situation.
In fact, it is not just the works to please the audience,
Audiences shouldn't buy tickets and sit back and enjoy their achievements.
I feel more and more that, well, works worthy of aftertaste,
Not to put all the content on the bright side,
but to show you only part of it,
As for the rest,
It should be done by our own thinking,
And different people will have different answers.
This era needs more works like this to exist.
View more about Cargo reviews
