The impact factor of a coin toss

Moshe 2022-11-14 13:35:44

At the beginning of the film, the professor and several of his students decided the roles of the prisoner and prisoner through questionnaires. According to my observation, the decision was based on the students participating in the experiment. The degree of desire for power and control . This principle was followed when deciding the first few role assignments, but when the last two candidates were decided, for some unexplained reason, a coin toss was used to make the decision. At this time, to a large extent affected the process of the entire experiment.
In other words, at this time, the experimental factor is the role of 8612 and the prisoner who mainly provoked the incident. Although the professor was waiting for 8612 to come back to assist others in escaping the prison, when his colleague asked him whether he had added the experimental factor, of course there was a strong rebuttal, but he obviously ignored the significant impact of the distribution of these two roles.
First of all, compared with other prisoners, the college students numbered 8612 were more inclined to resist all the prisoners' orders. On the first day of the experiment, they provoked, refuted, and abused the prisoners as francis pigs. Moreover, Jess also mentioned later that the reason why 8612 was unbearable on the second day of the experiment was because 8612 wanted to rule all the priests. Once the priests listened to 8612's dispatch, 8612 didn't seem to have any violent behavior. It shows that 8612's character tends to hold power, which means that he should have been selected as a prisoner. At the same time, the other person chosen by the coin seems to be the little prisoner with a partial oily hair. Compared with other prison inmates, his physique is shorter and thinner. Looking at the powerful factor in the experiment, in reality, there is a high probability that this small man belongs to the group of students who are neglected, bullied, and bullied. Therefore, when in this experiment, the professor did not take into account the personality tendencies shown by the psychological test, and randomly assigned the small man to the powerful prison, causing his psychological gap. This sudden rise in status, this stimulus made Small people are more abusive than others. These two experimental factors that violated the original status of society made the originally slow and boring experiment suddenly accelerated, and the first large-scale conflict occurred on the first day, so the contradiction intensified from the beginning of the experiment, which is why prison prisoners They quickly entered the role, benefiting from the stimulation of these two experimental factors.
This intensification of the contradiction unknowingly caused both the prisoner and the prisoner to fall into the whole situation, taking the experiment as a reality, as one of the students said, "it is not an experiment, it is a demonstration" (it is not an experiment, it is a demonstration). An experiment, this is an example). In this simulated small prison society, the asymmetry of its own rights and status magnifies everyone's emotions and senses. This abnormal social model makes prisoners unknowingly ignore the laws and human rights norms of the original society, and the prisoner seems to have no idea to ask a lawyer to defend his rights and save himself from the predicament. In fact, the development of the plot here is difficult to understand for those who have not experienced this experiment: in the United States in the 1970s, as a Stanford student, Prisoner did not immediately ask for a lawyer when his rights were violated. Moreover, it was also stated in the initial contract that once the subject wanted to terminate the participation, he had the right to do so, but most of them did not terminate the participation. The bigger problem is that when the prisoner started physical contact, beat and forced the prisoner, several prisoners had realized that the prisoner violated the contract, but the prisoner still did not indicate in time that they had the right to terminate the role relationship immediately. Various phenomena show that these students have no basic legal knowledge and awareness of defending rights, and even seem to have no understanding of contract law, which is contrary to the character setting of the highly educated Stanford students in the film.
Even if these unreasonable details can be explained arbitrarily by students lacking money and professors, maybe $15 a day was an attractive pay in the United States in the 1970s, but it still does not reflect logical integrity.

View more about The Stanford Prison Experiment reviews

Extended Reading

The Stanford Prison Experiment quotes

  • Jesse Fletcher: You brought me here to legitimize this experiment and there's nothing legitimate about this place, Phil.

    Dr. Philip Zimbardo: You're right. You're right. I didn't explain it well. Prisons, they represent a loss of freedom, literally and symbolically.

    Jesse Fletcher: Yeah, but that does not explain why they're wearing dresses. They're wearing dresses, Phil.

    Dr. Philip Zimbardo: Yes, I understand. Uh, we're trying to strip away their individuality. Make them uniform. Feminize them.

    Jesse Fletcher: Feminize them?

    Dr. Philip Zimbardo: Yes. Feminize them. Take away all the things that make them them. You see, we're trying to understand how an institution affects an individual's behavior. We're trying to do something... We're trying to do something good.

  • Karl Vandy: It's easy for you to say, 'Oh, I wouldn't have acted that way', but you don't know. That's - that's the truth. You don't know. And now I know what I'm capable of, and it hurts.