This is nothing but the dark side of human nature, everyone has a dark side, and you are not the flawless white lotus you imagined.

Zena 2022-10-29 20:28:13

Read the 01 German version and the 10 US version, plus this version. A lot of people like the 10-year version, and when I read this version, I also saw that most people said it was rubbish, not as good as the 10-year version. However, I think the 10-year version is the most rubbish, the 01 version is the best, and this step is the most reductive. There are always people watching movies from the perspective of God. Have you ever thought that if you are also a participant, can you still be the same as you are now? not necessarily.

The conversation between the "prisoner" and the "prison guard" at the end of the movie is very interesting, and it is recommended to watch it carefully.

Those who say kill these guards, kill this professor or this person is a big pervert in real life! Such comments, I think you can re-watch this movie without any prejudice and without opening the perspective of God. Imagine yourself as one of the prison guards. The experiment was a little shy at the beginning, but in order to get money, you can only play this role, and play according to the rules of the game, and the prisoners do not know these rules of the game. The first class was fairly normal, but the second one actually got a little out of control at the beginning. When he found out that he really had the power of a prison guard, he was already confused. He showed off to his colleagues, and the people who succeeded his class intensified his imitation. Most people lose themselves when they both enjoy and understand the power they have in their roles. Everyone has a dark side, you and I have both, no one is perfect, when you find that you can put all your dark sides on the surface, turn the bad thoughts that you usually have flashed into reality, and you don't have to bear it Any responsibility, when they will obey you, even if it is me, I can't say that I will not become these evil prison guards.

As for the prisoners, at the beginning of the experiment, everyone thought it was very interesting, but gradually they felt it was unfair, they had no human rights, they were not respected, and they wanted to resist. And all the people in the early years have been punished more or less, some punishment you have never experienced, you start to feel fear, gradually become obedient, because you do not want to be punished. When most people start to think that way, the revolution is destined to fail. 8612 is a relatively sober person, and he is also the first to leave. If he stays there, at most one night, he will become like them. Because of fear, but also because of daily torture. Then everyone started to lose themselves, they all forgot that it was an experiment, they thought they were really serving a sentence, they thought they were really committing a crime. They wanted to leave, but they never thought of withdrawing from the experiment. Instead, they went to talk to the so-called warden again and again about bail. Is it funny? ridiculous. In just a few days, they forgot who they were.

Finally, the professor, I think the change of the professor is very obvious. At the beginning, he invested a lot of manpower, material and financial resources for this experiment, and he very much hoped that this experiment would be successfully completed, and then some great achievements would be obtained. But in fact, in this experiment, he enjoys the supreme power, and he can decide everything. He decides how the game is played and how it ends. I think a lot of times he thinks certain behaviors are bad, but he uses the reason for the success of the experiment to persuade himself and others. Afterwards, everyone saw the result, lost in power. In the end, it was his colleague and his loved one who woke him up. Otherwise, I think, the more time passes, the deeper everyone will sink. When the two weeks are up, will the professor really end the experiment?

Many people scold what a bad movie, a waste of time, and why don't they kill it in the end, it's boring. Both versions 01 and 10 ended up fighting back, and I didn't think it was that cool. It's really hard to be brainwashed by that kind of living environment every day. Moreover, in these two versions, the prison guards are not so strict, and they also have time for free activities. In the 01 version, the male protagonist still took the task, and every time he almost lost, there was a comrade by his side. The male protagonist of the 10th edition has not yet understood why he is so targeted at the prison guards and keeps challenging the bottom line because of what? Whether you know the rules of the game or not, everyone knows the way of life in prisons, that is, prisoners must obey the prison guards. Even if they don't fully do it at first, they should cooperate in many cases because they want to get money. Later, it gradually became lost. In fact, everyone was pushing it. If all prisoners would not have a face-to-face conflict with the prison guards, then the prison guards would not punish the prisoners for the game to return to the original mode, so that they This feeling of transcendence of the guard's authority is never experienced, and the prisoner does not give in completely out of undue fear. Of course, some of the professor's words and deeds also strongly promote these bad things.

In fact, if they can shoot their roles interchangeably, I think it should be very fun. At that time, there probably won't be some infertility to fuck him. This kind of voice appears. Because all people are not 100% good people. Human nature cannot resist temptation. Everyone has the possibility of being lustful

View more about The Stanford Prison Experiment reviews

Extended Reading

The Stanford Prison Experiment quotes

  • Jesse Fletcher: You brought me here to legitimize this experiment and there's nothing legitimate about this place, Phil.

    Dr. Philip Zimbardo: You're right. You're right. I didn't explain it well. Prisons, they represent a loss of freedom, literally and symbolically.

    Jesse Fletcher: Yeah, but that does not explain why they're wearing dresses. They're wearing dresses, Phil.

    Dr. Philip Zimbardo: Yes, I understand. Uh, we're trying to strip away their individuality. Make them uniform. Feminize them.

    Jesse Fletcher: Feminize them?

    Dr. Philip Zimbardo: Yes. Feminize them. Take away all the things that make them them. You see, we're trying to understand how an institution affects an individual's behavior. We're trying to do something... We're trying to do something good.

  • Karl Vandy: It's easy for you to say, 'Oh, I wouldn't have acted that way', but you don't know. That's - that's the truth. You don't know. And now I know what I'm capable of, and it hurts.