The logical basis of this article is very absurd. Can you live for 300 years if you drink human oil? Any plot development based on this cannot be inferred from common sense. The director can shoot whatever he wants: Hannah said for the first time that there was something in the water and refused to enter the water. Why did it get into the water again when it was very late. She knows there are eels in the water? And it happened to be my first aunt (she should be panicked about her sudden bleeding)? Did the male owner really fracture his hind leg in a car accident and he couldn't feel it? According to the plot, it is obvious that there is no fracture (only a few days will be better?), many details are deliberately misleading the audience to deliberate, in fact, the deletion of the plot does not affect the development of the plot and the understanding of the plot. The plot is absurd and not worthy of scrutiny. It is basically a picture of a cat and a dog, trying to imitate the confinement island pretending to be suspenseful but nondescript pretending connotation, junk film. It’s okay to cut it for 1 hour
One point for the male starring skills and one point for the Swiss scenery
View more about A Cure for Wellness reviews
