But it is also a documentary, but it is too irrational. If you think about it deeply, the director's intention and practice are even disgusting, and you will deduct 1 star.
The film's intention is to reverse the case, but it can't produce any sufficient evidence. Obviously, it doesn't take the time to make a rational analysis of the trial process. Most of them are subjective judgments and emotional catharsis of various outsiders, and they use extremely indiscriminate means to guide the audience. , actually did not turn off the microphone twice during the shooting interval, leaking the suspect's self-talk...
Even if the suspect is a high-energy sociopath, he has full motives and has committed many crimes, but only "wrong time, wrong place, very often " also constitutes only a reasonable doubt. The chain of evidence is not clear enough to convict.
The film doesn't actually prove that the trial was unjust, it's just a bunch of meaningless, weak babble. However, it highly catered to the public's skepticism about this incident and earned all the attention!
View more about The Jinx: The Life and Deaths of Robert Durst reviews
