suspects:
1. Jacob: The preconceived notion is so serious that even the fuck thinks it was homicide, just because there is thin evidence: Jacob's fingerprints.
2. In addition to this, there is only one suspect with a previous criminal record,
3. Suspects, yes, yes, there are only two, choose one of the two (black question mark expression). There is no case-solving and reasoning process to eliminate doubts.
Prosecutor:
The violent genetic remarks throughout the play seem to be overwhelming like racism, and even put on a scientific cloak. All the inferences about Jacob being a murderer are fingerprints and genetic discrimination and, with it, hobby discrimination. To put it bluntly, hobbies are like some people who like to watch horror movies, bloody and violent movies. This is used as a testimony by the prosecutor, which is really funny.
His mother:
After the attempted murder, he seems to be in good spirits, and he also said that he was going to return to the past. Why did he have to do it earlier? He looks like a victim, like a mother, and there is no mother's love in the whole play, like a stepmother? In addition, this woman, if you believe in the law, don't be arrogant; if you believe in family love, don't think that the novel posts are reality; in the end, you only believe in yourself and play the role of God. It was this woman who really had a mental problem. The contrast after she was not prosecuted showed that she really regarded herself as a god.
grandfather:
Like racial discrimination, one is a gene that controls skin color, and the other is a gene that controls emotions, and they are treated unfairly because of their differences. This woman's concept of discrimination is terrible, even more than that of her grandfather. His grandfather knew that my fate was up to me.
male:
In addition, the man doesn't know why he loves this woman so much, he didn't maintain the family from beginning to end, and he didn't have a trace of trust in Jacob, but he just heard rumors, and he has been entangled in heredity. Just look at the brake print and you'll know it's a well-documented crime, but the man maintains it. The male protagonist threw the knife for no other reason, just because the discrimination was too serious and had to be like this, just like a black American who took out a document and was shot. In the end, the male protagonist actually defended the female. In addition to the disgusting happiness of the female at the end, the male protagonist was not surprised at all, which was equivalent to admitting that the female's genetic discrimination against himself and his father, Jacob was correct, and acquiesced to the killing. Jacob's behavior. At first, what he believed to be the supremacy of the law was ultimately defeated by discrimination.
In the end, there is basically no case-solving link in this play, and there is a war of words at the beginning. The role of police detectives is not as good as that of prosecutors and lawyers. If everything is handed over to prosecutors and lawyers, then they are really invincible, and they are going to be promoted and rich. This may be the status quo in the United States that needs to be improved. Discrimination is above the truth, lawyers are above the law, and most of the national tax revenue is infringed.
The tone of the whole show is so dark, and with the silver-gray temperament of Apple, I really think it is very high-quality. But the script is as stubborn as the idea. Therefore, the reality described is very cruel and cannot be changed. In the end, I just saw that from the beginning to the end, basically no one's psychological activity in the play changes, so I can't see how well the acting is performed.
The 5-star recommendation is first because of the US team, and secondly because of this theme. If it is not to expose the reality, it is to be reflected in the reality.
View more about Defending Jacob reviews
