Is it trust or self-righteousness?

Although the parents in the film have a place where guardianship or even supervision is not in place, I think the responsibility of the parents is relatively small. For example, the open-mindedness and tolerance of the parents in the film are rare even today. The daughter in the film The character bought the navel dress, but the parents did not strictly stop it; the daughter said that she met Charlie on the Internet, and the parents did not go to great lengths to censor the ins and outs of this person, but learned some basic information (whether the parents are responsible for this is debatable, After all, the daughter character in the film is fourteen years old, and asking too many questions will cause resistance, and it is too irresponsible to ask not to ask, so I think the script is very good and very realistic).
I agree that most of the blame lies with the role of the daughter, but I don't think environmental factors can be put aside. It's like we talk about tutoring. Everyone has different ways of dealing with family problems, and the way fathers and mothers deal with them in the script is typical.
The mother is tolerant and believes that her daughter is not at fault. The most important thing when things happen is support and encouragement (similar to that incompetent psychological trauma therapist, she needs to prescribe the right medicine, but I only see the psychiatrist constantly inducing her daughter to speak her mind. The idea is to gain the trust of the "victim", but it fails to further help an ignorant minor to clarify his own lack of cognition and his own responsibility.)
The role of the father is typical of rage and hatred , I think this character's many compromises when facing his daughter and wife in the film are a bit unacceptable (at least 40% can't agree). The father hates himself for failing to protect family members, and hates his daughter for defending the abuser after the incident; further the role of the father confuses hatred for himself with guilt for his daughter Responsibility, when I watched the film, I couldn't help but imagine the dialogue in each scene.
"The disease is in urgent need of medicine". After this kind of thing happened, the blind understanding, tolerance, and support did not make the daughter wake up earlier, and said earlier, "This kind of thing also has your own responsibility, and you feel fooled after meeting. Don't leave when it's time to leave, don't go up until you get into the other party's car, call for help or even run away when you're in a motel, instead of blaming your family for not understanding you, not blaming your friends for reporting the police when you've been assaulted , not at the dinner table of a family gathering to confuse whether my brother has a normal relationship with his girlfriend or not and he was seduced by someone over 35 years old.” If you say that, even if it will hurt your daughter, but if you drink it in the first place, long pain is worse than short pain, say it, make it clear, Better than being bored there.
It's a pity that the father's role is just dumbfounded, and it's a pity that the mother's role swept to the ground when the father was collecting information and blamed the father for not being able to communicate with the daughter (in fact, no one can communicate in the face of this situation). , the father's role was silent again, as if he had once again resisted the responsibility without hesitation.
But in any case, the setting of the characters is very typical and logical, the emotional conflict is also very realistic, and the persuasion of the seducer is too strong, which is a small bug (how can today's children be so easily abducted to the motel! Cut ~ unless drugged) (⊙_⊙)
Ross is very talented~ hehe

View more about Trust reviews