Just by reading the opening chapter, I felt it was a warning for a bad movie. First, a splashing water battle started, and suddenly, really suddenly, it switched to the relationship between father and son, which was very abrupt. The seriously ill son is the traction line, and the extra water splashing battle in front is really superfluous. After all, the protagonist is the father, so there is no need to intersperse reality and the past all the time, it is really super dramatic.
I don’t think the shooting technique is very clever, and then it’s the core of the story. In fact, the whole story is an ordinary youth counterattack story. This set of Disney has the most say. Including me, but this movie has no sense of substitution because of the interspersed method, so the whole story is actually incoherent, more like the accumulation of fragments.
Then there is the issue of the three views inside. First of all, the brotherhood they praised includes the use of profound words like family to describe their relationship with each other, but from the perspective of the presentation of the picture, most of them are scenes of mutual oppression, such as asking each other to go The challenge of taking a big adventure, if you don't do it, you will beat him. If this is considered a brotherly relationship, then the violent elements should be the most emotional! There is also the removal of the other party's door to play tricks. It feels that their way of making friends is to challenge the other party's tolerance limit in a way that the other party hates.
Just like when I started to contact my brother, the male protagonist said: I was so busy with work that I forgot to contact my family. I think it's not that I forgot, but that the relationship is not that close. After all, all relationships that use oppression will not leave warmth. I feel that this movie is a bit forced. How can a friend who has a good relationship with the university have no contact information, and he still needs to go to the social network to find it. At least I don't have it. Even a friend who has broken up but had a good relationship has contact information. It's not because of anything else, but because this person is there. You are important in your heart, and you want to know his current situation. This is an emotional instinctive reaction, but this movie is very contradictory. A friend who has not been in touch for so long will delay work to accompany him. If it is me, I will It must have felt awkward and unfamiliar.
If you don't believe me, just look at the embarrassed expressions on the wedding invitations sent by friends. If you haven't been in touch for a long time, can you really be called a relationship. So from when he went to his college classmates, I knew that the relationship between these people was very weak. After all, they didn't even have a phone number, so it was really hard to believe that they had a deep relationship with each other.
What's more, he interrupted his son's rest again and again, can you think? A person with a tumor in his brain, surrounded by a group of adults talking about his past, that feeling is like going home during the New Year, listening to adults talk about daily life, and his parents have repeatedly refused to listen to the doctor's advice , I have to bring a group of people in the intensive care unit to tell previous stories, aren’t they afraid that the spread of bacteria will lead to aggravation of the disease?
Let’s not talk about logic, after all, the core of the whole story is that people in 4 buildings beat 3 buildings. Here I have to complain and make a bet with my lover. I don’t think this man loves this woman much. First of all, this man chases this woman. I find it very strange for a woman, because it was a lie that created this relationship. At the beginning, it was really the request of the senior, and then he lied again and again, just to get close to this woman. I don’t think it’s a pursuit. but deception. Of course, the heroine will definitely fall in love with him, after all, that's how it is, don't care about logic, and then two people start to fall in love, the logic of a woman is: a game is a game, it's not very important, the logic of a man is: it's very important about the loser of glory. In fact, I think women are right, and men are just for face.
The two people got into trouble here, and then the man swore by the woman that he would win the game. All kinds of women were ignored. When I saw this, my face was full of question marks, so a game is more important than a beloved woman? In fact, an equation is drawn here: face (competition) > study > beloved woman > everything.
It's like an alcoholic said: My family and my beloved woman didn't let me quit drinking, but the competition helped me quit drinking.
My face is full of: ? ? ? ? ? ?
Therefore, the face is too big, and the three views in this movie are very obvious. Is this really the three views worth recommending? The point is the way they play, which I think is also very dirty, such as deliberately shouting and shouting to disrupt the game, such as deliberately pretending to be beaten, etc. The tricks that are not gentlemen won the situation for the better, and then I met 3 lower buildings, In the last 3 buildings, such insidious and cunning people applauded the 4 buildings? This is very damaging. Is it because they are applauding for the same kind who want to lose by unscrupulous means? It's hard to understand that a person who loses a game and gets angry and makes small moves will personally give this honor to the stumbling block that has been standing in front of his eyes when he wins the game.
In fact, the director wanted to maintain the righteous role of the male protagonist at the beginning. He should use his strength to let them win the game, otherwise what is the difference between them and the three buildings? I really can't applaud them, because they were all obtained through psychological warfare.
The main point is to complain, this heroine is really miserable. First of all, she is beautiful and then has excellent grades. As a result, she was walking at the door of the dormitory and saw a pair of poor perverts asking her for girls' clothes. She volunteered to help, after all, she didn't want to. They were beaten. Then one of the good-looking men used the same reason to harass her every day, kidnapped her morally, and asked her to accompany him to dinner and to watch movies with him. Speaking of which, many women already feel that the man's intentions are impure, but the heroine does not. She is in love and knows that this man is a moral kidnapping, and he has fallen into the pit.
It's good to fall in love and talk about it. This man has to win the championship, just like being possessed. The heroine persuaded a few words, the man turned his face and left, and then in the next few days, he Seeing this man's various stinky faces, let alone coaxing, he didn't even say a word to her, and then the heroine wanted to reconcile with him, and ran to the game scene, and then the man glanced at her. Walking in front of her, only his brother said to her: He bet on you because he bet on the one he loved.
I saw the face at that time: ? ? ? ? ?
I really want to say, so don't break up and keep it for the New Year? As a result, the heroine was moved, and then she silently waited for the end of their game, the man came to him, and waited well, and suddenly his roommate ran over and said: We need you to call a man to play all night to win the game.
Not to mention that the heroine uses her real name to make phone calls, just calling all night, which is exhausting and exhausting, can bring two negative effects: 1. She may be harassed, because she is making a real-name call, and she may make phone calls. The man on the other end thought that she had acquiesced in a close relationship with each other, and he might come to her the next day. If the female protagonist refuted, then those who were stressed might have revenge. 2. Staying up late is inherently bad, especially for women.
So the question is, a man loves a woman, and is willing to let her be like this? It is difficult to equate this kind of use with love. If this kind of use is also called love, it will inevitably be suspected of PUA.
I know very well that this movie is meant to be an inspirational movie. For example, failure is not terrible, you never persevere, it is terrible. For example, failure is not important, but the process of hard work is important. No matter how beautiful the hat is, as shown in the movie, it is an indisputable fact that the game is won by means of villains, and it is also an indisputable fact that a man uses a woman's love to complete a beauty plan. I do not agree, inspirational = unscrupulous. It's not difficult to admit defeat, but to win defeat by any means is more worthy of being spurned than an upright failure, but the film does not spurn it, but does it in the name of a dream.
Whether it is love, friendship, or the form of expression, I feel that it is not worth recommending. Friendship is presented by campus bullying, and love is presented by the use of moral kidnapping. The values presented in the script are really worrying.
In my mind, a film that cannot tell a good story is not necessarily a bad film, but a film that conveys dirty values must be a bad film.
View more about Chhichhore reviews
