After World War II, Germany liquidated Hitlerism and its totalitarian system and achieved democracy and freedom. Paradoxically, however, Germany has also formed a free-speech zone: Hitler must not be spoken of directly. In this way, the freedom of speech of the people in a democratic system is incomplete. Without rational discussion and evaluation of Hitler, people cannot rationally and objectively analyze the correct side of his thoughts. Hitler came to power through an election, and all the Germans voted for him to come to power. How could his ideas and propositions be all wrong and sinful? The first is his racist ideology. In the movie "Hitler is Back", his thoughts are depicted very concisely and vividly: Hitler asked: If a shepherd and a dachshund mate, what will you get? The woman said: A shepherd dachshund. Hitler: What would it be like? Women: Funny look. Hitler: Just imagine two shepherd dachshunds mating, there will never be a shepherd, the shepherd will disappear, and this is happening in Germany. In the next shot, an old man said to Hitler: The average IQ of Africans who came to Germany was between 40-50, while the Germans used to be above 80. I think the IQ is now above 60, and more and more IQ will drop even more with the arrival of immigrants. Where is the Sheep Dachshund story biologically wrong? According to the second law of thermodynamics, entropy tends to increase overall. You drop a drop of dark blue ink into a basin of water, and sooner or later it will diffuse into the whole basin, and there will be no more dark blue ink and white water. The races are mixed, and sooner or later, there will be only one race in the world. No more yellows, whites, blacks, browns. Not to mention anything else, should such a monotonous race really be the future of mankind that we expect? You don't want to have only one kind of dog and one kind of bear in the world (no more pandas!), right? This is true of animals, let alone humans? Mixed races, what a serious issue this is! And just because Hitler had a racist view, should humanity be closed off from discussion? The second is his platoon appearance. There are only a few developed countries in the United States, Europe and Japan, and the vast majority of people live in developing countries. Not to mention the social environment, level of civilization, etc., simply considering the same labor, the income in developed countries is dozens of times higher than in developing countries, and people in developing countries are naturally willing to go to developed countries. But now there is only a small Syria, and its refugee problem has made Europe so devastated. Would Germany still be Germany without restrictions on immigration? Will Europe not become another Latin America? After Hitler, now Germans, Europeans and Americans, and the whole world, cannot discuss racism and anti-immigration. So just because Hitler was an animal protectionist, do we say animal protectionism is wrong? The returned Hitler said what people thought in their hearts, but they were too inconvenient to say. That's why he is popular. The key is not that he has eloquence and skills, but that what he said is right! The truth can never be truly obliterated. Sooner or later it will break through all closures. However, this is only one aspect of Hitlerism, the aspect of his fascination. He has another aspect: totalitarianism, aggressive expansionism, genocide. Such was the case with Hitler in history, and "Hitler who came back" did not preach these ideas at all. Contemporary Germany and Europe do not have the fermenting background of these ideas either. Therefore, Hitler in the film against the current environment will naturally not mention these ideas. Therefore, the thoughts he showed were only those reasonable thoughts above. Therefore, when the audience watches the movie, they will feel that what Hitler said when he comes back is actually what he thinks in his heart, so he has to sympathize secretly. On the other hand, because this is what Hitler said, it is difficult to accept, feel confused, and worry: if the "returned Hitler" does come back to power, will it start with anti-immigration and end with totalitarianism and war? There will definitely be no war at the beginning, but who can guarantee that there will be no war in the long run? This is also the confusion of Europe. The film objectively reflects people's partial recognition and confusion about the "Returning Hitler". The film does not express its clear attitude. The attitude of the film is actually exactly that kind of attitude of partial approval and partial confusion. This is an objective film. After Hitler, now Germans, Europeans and Americans, and the whole world, cannot discuss racism and anti-immigration. So just because Hitler was an animal protectionist, do we say animal protectionism is wrong? The returned Hitler said what people thought in their hearts, but they were too inconvenient to say. That's why he is popular. The key is not that he has eloquence and skills, but that what he said is right! The truth can never be truly obliterated. Sooner or later it will break through all closures. However, this is only one aspect of Hitlerism, the aspect of his fascination. He has another aspect: totalitarianism, aggressive expansionism, genocide. Such was the case with Hitler in history, and "Hitler who came back" did not preach these ideas at all. Contemporary Germany and Europe do not have the fermenting background of these ideas either. Therefore, Hitler in the film against the current environment will naturally not mention these ideas. Therefore, the thoughts he showed were only those reasonable thoughts above. Therefore, when the audience watches the movie, they will feel that what Hitler said when he comes back is actually what he thinks in his heart, so he has to sympathize secretly. On the other hand, because this is what Hitler said, it is difficult to accept, feel confused, and worry: if the "returned Hitler" does come back to power, will it start with anti-immigration and end with totalitarianism and war? There will definitely be no war at the beginning, but who can guarantee that there will be no war in the long run? This is also the confusion of Europe. The film objectively reflects people's partial recognition and confusion about the "Returning Hitler". The film does not express its clear attitude. The attitude of the film is actually exactly that kind of attitude of partial approval and partial confusion. This is an objective film. After Hitler, now Germans, Europeans and Americans, and the whole world, cannot discuss racism and anti-immigration. So just because Hitler was an animal protectionist, do we say animal protectionism is wrong? The returned Hitler said what people thought in their hearts, but they were too inconvenient to say. That's why he is popular. The key is not that he has eloquence and skills, but that what he said is right! The truth can never be truly obliterated. Sooner or later it will break through all closures. However, this is only one aspect of Hitlerism, the aspect of his charisma. He has another aspect: totalitarianism, aggressive expansionism, genocide. Such was the case with Hitler in history, and "Hitler who came back" did not preach these ideas at all. Contemporary Germany and Europe do not have the fermenting background of these ideas either. Therefore, Hitler in the film against the current environment will naturally not mention these ideas. Therefore, the thoughts he showed were only those reasonable thoughts above. Therefore, when the audience watches the movie, they will feel that what Hitler said when he comes back is actually what he thinks in his heart, so he has to sympathize secretly. On the other hand, because this is what Hitler said, it is difficult to accept, feel confused, and worry: if the "returned Hitler" does come back to power, will it start with anti-immigration and end with totalitarianism and war? There will definitely be no war at the beginning, but who can guarantee that there will be no war in the long run? This is also the confusion of Europe. The film objectively reflects people's partial recognition and confusion about the "Returning Hitler". The film does not express its clear attitude. The attitude of the film is actually exactly that kind of attitude of partial approval and partial confusion. This is an objective film. Such was the case with Hitler in history, and "Hitler who came back" did not preach these ideas at all. Contemporary Germany and Europe do not have the fermenting background of these ideas either. Therefore, Hitler in the film against the current environment will naturally not mention these ideas. Therefore, the thoughts he showed were only those reasonable thoughts above. Therefore, when the audience watches the movie, they will feel that what Hitler said when he comes back is actually what he thinks in his heart, so he has to sympathize secretly. On the other hand, because this is what Hitler said, it is difficult to accept, feel confused, and worry: if the "returned Hitler" does come back to power, will it start with anti-immigration and end with totalitarianism and war? There will definitely be no war at the beginning, but who can guarantee that there will be no war in the long run? This is also the confusion of Europe. The film objectively reflects people's partial recognition and confusion about the "Returning Hitler". The film does not express its clear attitude. The attitude of the film is actually exactly that kind of attitude of partial approval and partial confusion. This is an objective film. Such was the case with Hitler in history, and "Hitler who came back" did not preach these ideas at all. Contemporary Germany and Europe do not have the fermenting background of these ideas either. Therefore, Hitler in the film against the current environment will naturally not mention these ideas. Therefore, the thoughts he showed were only those reasonable thoughts above. Therefore, when the audience watches the movie, they will feel that what Hitler said when he comes back is actually what he thinks in his heart, so he has to sympathize secretly. On the other hand, because this is what Hitler said, it is difficult to accept, feel confused, and worry: if the "returned Hitler" does come back to power, will it start with anti-immigration and end with totalitarianism and war? There will definitely be no war at the beginning, but who can guarantee that there will be no war in the long run? This is also the confusion of Europe. The film objectively reflects people's partial recognition and confusion about the "Returning Hitler". The film does not express its clear attitude. The attitude of the film is actually exactly that kind of attitude of partial approval and partial confusion. This is an objective film.
View more about Look Who's Back reviews
