First of all, I don't think there's still a crusade against tech this season. The last two episodes obviously don't touch upon technology.
Speaking of the first episode, I think the core is not actually technology.
If you have it, you are afraid of losing it. If you lose it, you want to have it again. When you come back, you don’t want it anymore.
That feeling may be more important.
Of course, this feeling will also push you to make the decision to get rid of this feeling, isn't it paradoxical?
Of course, he wouldn't have the heart to attack such a machine, because his appearance is so in line with the idiom of sound, face and smile. Even if it is Dongshi's frown, if it looks the same, can it still be regarded as Dongshi? !
So I think the point should be You should move on...
Thinking of the scene in "Harry Potter" where Sirius died, Harry was very sad, looking at the mirror with Sirius alone, wanted to call him, wanted him face resurfaced.
Remember when Harry asked Dumbledore if Sirius could come back? Dumbledore said, no way. Harry asked a lot of possibilities, but the one that struck me the most was the question Sirius could become like those wandering spirits at Hogwarts? Although I don't remember it in detail, to the effect Dumbledore said, no, I know the process, the brave man will keep moving forward, I know Sirius, he will not choose to stay, he will definitely move forward, and he will not change. into a wandering soul.
Probably so. You need courage when you move on.
Saiyan love said, A Skeleton in the Cupboard. Here became the invisible man in the attic. Or let that person be the one who lives in your heart.
On the contrary, the extension of the second episode may be more in line with the image of the Internet mob. However, no matter whether it can be traced back to the guillotine of Charles I, a certain Communist International, or the founding of the United States, shadows can be found. Most people's tyranny is too much to give an example.
But I didn't understand what the point of this episode was at first, as some people said, the thriller has more than enough depth. After reading a comment, the teacher who was exposed to child abuse begged for mercy in the media: "I already knew I was wrong, in order not to let me go." I always thought that knowing the mistake and letting you go are not the same logic. I'll let you go as long as you know what's wrong, so what if you're hurt by others? In the blink of an eye I thought of another example, which I thought was more appropriate. Ding Jinhao, the child who engraved a visit here on the statue of the pharaoh the year before, was not only flogged, but even the primary school's website was hacked for a visit here.
I was wondering how anyone would go to this boring White Bear Park, whether it was just or not, shouting excitedly outside the door glass to whip a criminal who should have already been sentenced. It turned out that someone was so bored that they would pretend to be Ding Jinhao or some other weirdo on the Internet and then arouse everyone's anger, or make nonsense about his elementary school website, which is tantamount to throwing tomatoes at a glass house. Strange human beings, even if there is justice and trial, the Internet mob is still not enough. Of course, not to mention the phasing out of the death penalty, the anger may be greater, so riots like the London riots are not necessarily much more peaceful than ours.
Recommend Linda's article: The jury has reached a verdict.
But even so, I am still surprised by the day-to-day torture. The characteristics of Internet hotspots are that the time is short, and the heat comes and goes quickly. But everyone remembers revenge for a lifetime. No wonder Li Tianyi wants to change his name. I wonder if Ding Jinhao has changed his name?
Episode three. It's a good story, but it's quite simple, because everything is a position, and no position is a position. Just like the controversy caused by the Hong Kong political textbook incident, those who oppose textbooks containing mainland ideology are actually promoting democracy and freedom. ideology.
Politics is dirty, of course, but not dirty, what should we do?
It seems that today's young people are increasingly disliking and staying away from politics. As a result, commercialization has expanded and flooded, and iPods and iPads have become popular, lack of pursuit, spiritual emptiness, and nihilism.
Some people have long joked that if the president is directly elected, Ma Huateng only needs to say that he will be elected with six Q coins per person. Of course, this is election bribery. I think, when Tencent is in full swing, Ma Huateng may not be elected, maybe QQ Penguin will be elected.
The layer of work and self-created image is a bit superficial, and the disintegration of countless entrepreneurial teams is caused by this. Needless to say.
But necessary evil is always necessary, even if you think waldo is good, but even if he is elected, do you let such a screen sit on the chair of the Legislative Council?
Govern a country with nothingness? It's not Huang Lao thinking!
This season is generally good, a little dull, and I still liked the episode of cycling to change the number of kilometers in the last season.
View more about Be Right Back reviews
