there is no lower limit to the existence of a bad movie.
When I first saw the trailer, I was so amused that
I immediately put the film on the must-see list for this year.
I didn't expect the final result,
but I admire myself for sticking to the end of the film...
Although Camel doesn't watch TV much,
he still knows a little bit about local programs in Shenzhen.
I like to watch the "No Rice Show" before 2008,
because although many children are big boys,
at least they still retain the innocence and nature of children.
But now the program is full of the operations of parents and program groups, and the
adult sophistication and trained performances
have lost the original meaning of the column.
Originally, we liked this show and liked watching children,
not to repeat the daily worldliness and hypocrisy,
not to be conscientious and meticulous.
Going back to the movie, it's the same question.
The protagonist's deliberate imitation of adults is too much!
Completely lost the naturalness of being a child.
The imitator, John Cusack, said it was stressful.
On the other hand, although the audience of this film includes children,
the photographers too underestimated the audience's IQ.
A simple thing has to be paved with piles of details,
and for fear that you may not understand each detail, mark A, B, and C for each detail,
and then shout: "Okay, what's going on next! "The
arrogant male protagonist and the natural dumb male partner,
the black-bellied brother and the inexistent female partner (go and shoot "Kai Bian Wang 2"!), the
snotty male and the violent female...
But the mess of the character setting is
far less than the mess of the plot,
and it is also a nonsensical reversal of the protagonist at the end of the film.
The cheese part is simply a copy of "How to Eat Fried Caterpillars", and I
can't find any other adjective except disgusting.
It's a really disappointing film, and
I think I'd better watch South Park.
View more about Diary of a Wimpy Kid reviews
