Regarding the analysis of the so-called BUG analyzed by some people, if you want to look up, don't enter the brain.

Jordan 2022-10-07 13:50:44

Seeing that some people think they have found a lot of bugs and analyze them one by one, I really can't stand it. I specially wrote this article to contribute to the improvement of the IQ of all human beings.

Many bugs are not bugs that you think your eyes have found, and basically It's not a bug, it's just far-fetched. Picking a bug is not so picky, but I didn't read it carefully and thought I understood everything.

One, why did the old man save Sarah. The old man may have some abnormal mentality, but it is not a complete psychological distortion or a murderous maniac. He will only make choices when necessary, instead of looking for cats and dogs all over the world to cut down and feed monsters, and kill the black policewoman at the end of the film. Just because there is no one around and the policewoman is at the entrance of the hole.

Second, why did the sheriff hide and tuck Sarah after they found out, and didn't let the media report it immediately, and didn't call for more help? Why sneak down the well? For the credit? What kind of merit is this invited? Best manpower saving award?

Where did you see that it was hidden and tucked? When was it sneaking? I don’t know if you watched it fast-forward or doze off. The TV station reported that the reporters interviewed on the spot. The senator ordered the state police to find her daughter. Professional prospectors and dozens of local police searched for a few days. How to make a splash? Is it a sensation when the President of the United States is surrounded by FBI? What's more, people's understanding at the time was that it was just an abandoned mine. Well-equipped prospectors and local police were enough. Why don't you send a legion?

Third, when Sarah recalled everything, why not only did she not run back, but also tried her best to drill into the Longtan Tiger's Den?
Do you think everyone is Iron Man Batman Captain America? It was just an ordinary woman. When suddenly there are terrifying memories, it is easy for people to go into a state of madness. It is easy to shout and shout. Sara, I think the director has already opened the golden finger. It is very good to have her performance. , Her mood at the time was just to leave this place as soon as possible. As for whether the road was right or wrong with other people, it was out of her consideration. After a while, she rescued the female police officer, which was the reason why she had calmed down. You asked her to calmly analyze and deal with the surrounding relationships rationally as soon as she recalled the terrible memory? As for why he didn't go back the same way after he calmed down, because with the sound of a gunshot, the original road had been buried by the collapsed gravel and couldn't go back. All I can say is that Zhuge Liang will do it after the fact, don't say go into the mine yourself, let you go into the sewers and see if you dare.

Fourth, the boy who drilled the monster's head with an electric drill was slow and deliberate, completely unreasonable.
Come on, this is a movie, there are sub-shots. You feel that the action is slow and deliberate because the director uses seven or eight sub-shots to express what happens in one or two seconds. If there is only one shot, you will only see him touch the electric drill and plunge into it. Monster head, that's all, you might not even be able to see what's going in there. For example, if you use three sub-shots to show a shootout, the first sub-shot is that the gangster and the police are 10 meters away, and the bandit fires a shot. A sub-lens turned to the police, the policemen's chest clothes were torn and blood splattered. These three sub-shots took 5 seconds, and then you pinch your fingers, oh my god, it took 5 seconds to shoot from a distance of ten meters to hit, do the bullets fly so slowly? Don't the police know how to hide? Didn't the gangster know to shoot earlier? The slowness and deliberateness of the action is completely unreasonable! I found another bug!

Fifth, the sheriff is also mentally ill. In this case, he has to be handcuffed with others, lest our actions be too convenient. As a result, being chopped off by life is really self-inflicted, and of course, women are really willing.
The reason they were tortured together was because Sara insisted on leaving and had already taken action. At that time, she couldn't do anything without stopping and staring at it all the time. Maybe she would disappear in the blink of an eye. In the emergency situation at that time, I felt that the sheriff did something. This choice is understandable, otherwise how would you do it? Under the circumstance of monsters, cameo psychological counselor to work patiently and tell the truth? Tears moved people's hearts? I think this is the case, the sheriff can still consider the life and death of sara is a very important thing. If you change to an ordinary person, I will take care of your life or death. I almost died.

Sixth, the man with the electric drill who jumped off the cliff with the monster should have fallen to pieces long ago. Even if he was dragged by the monster to his lair as a food reserve, he would not be able to breathe and call for help.
I'm too lazy to say this, please go to the first part, there is a deep pool under the cliff.

Seven, how the monster usually survives.
Since it is already a monster, it looks like a humanoid is actually a different species. You can't use the human living environment to bring the monster's status quo. Are you sure that the monster needs clean water? Need sleep? Can't eat anything but mice? Just carnivores? For animals, if there is no natural enemy in the wild, it is equivalent to entering heaven. If there is no natural disaster, there will be no extinction at all. On the contrary, the city where humans live is like hell to animals, not to mention that it is obvious that monsters have a certain IQ, which may be better than Not human but not mentally retarded, what is the basis for monsters to starve to death without the feeding of the old man? As for the difficulty of hunting successfully on the surface, I don't know how you came to this conclusion. The first part has made it clear that monsters are only visually degraded, not impossible to hunt. They are very sensitive to hearing and have a strong IQ and physique. Monster hunting is not something that pampered modern people consider very high-end.
I will give a detail in the film. At the end of the film, a monster drags an elk down from the entrance of the cave. Some people may think that the old man dragged the elk to the entrance of the cave. Those who have this view are purely brain fragments that did not eat on time and dragged the elk from the monster. It's not particularly strenuous in terms of posture, but knowing that an adult elk like this weighs 250 kilograms, you let that old man drag it to the hole? Do you think he's Iron Man and has a nuclear power battery on his chest? It is impossible for any man in the prime of life on the earth to drag any adult elk with his bare hands. From this lens, it can be analyzed that the elk was hunted by the monster himself.
It has a certain IQ, agile movements, infinite strength, and keen hearing. It can make group aggressive behaviors similar to wolves. It has no weaknesses except that it has no eyesight. Some people say that such a species needs to be fed by other species to survive. I don’t know. What kind of thinking would come to this conclusion.

As for the motive of the old man to feed the monster in the end, this thing is like why the court generally does not convict the mentally ill of murdering. , not to mention to analyze the psychology of others? People often say what will happen to me when something happens to me, and I will be blinded when something happens to me. Afterwards, I can't figure out why there are many people who do that. We just need to know that old men sometimes attack humans. And drag it to the hole to feed the monster.

In the end, Juno's throat was torn and he was desperate to save Sara's life. This was under the premise that Sara cut through Juno's legs and dragged the monster to escape. Sara shed a few tears at the dying Juno. , is said to be the tears of a crocodile, I really really don't understand how cold-blooded people are to come to this conclusion, the so-called grace of a drop of water should be repaid by a spring, saving a life is better than building a seven-level pagoda. En can't even shed a few tears? Tears are all fake, alas, I really don't know what to say.

Rational analysis of what happens, use your brain more, human survival depends on a highly developed brain, not two eyeballs.

View more about The Descent: Part 2 reviews

Extended Reading

The Descent: Part 2 quotes

  • Sarah Carter: Those things were coming for us, so I hurt her so I could get away.

  • [first lines]

    Ed Oswald: Jeez!