After reading a lot of comments, I feel that it is very different from the film in my own eyes, so I have some personal opinions: 1. In my eyes, the film is neat and beautiful at the textbook level, especially in the drama; the director is also very stable, and it may be possible in some places. The treatment is too dramatic and disrupts the severe expression and criticism. Perhaps I can expect Eastwood to shoot such a story in my heart. If you analyze the drama and audio-visual techniques, there are too many shining points, and there is no motivation to write carefully at this moment. Just a few words at the end may not be read by a few people. 2. After a cursory scan, in a bunch of film reviews, Yang's derogation is that he can't find the right thing. Focus on this question: i. Don't worry too much about the plot! Because of Sloan's layout and strategizing, he coldly and determinedly believes that the film's awesome views are really laymen. The role of awesome is written by the screenwriter, directed by the director, performed by the actors, and qualified in all aspects of work, so you can substitute. I believe this role is powerful, but you must be able to jump out and see the fictional nature of the literary work. "The character IQ is high, so the standard of the film is high, or the plot is reversed. Unexpectedly, behind it is conspiracy and calculation is the director is powerful." This is a Chinese audience, especially the so-called "brain-burning" movie audience. Misunderstanding. What clown plays well is because he can tell three different versions of smiles at the corners of his mouth. "Super Body" is powerful because it dares to make people's brains 100% developed. It is all absurd, and behind it is logic or some basic knowledge. The missing. It is also for this reason that we have been immersed in film reviews that retell the plot and analyze how tortuous or touching the story is. We hold these things that have nothing to do with the artistic level as serious criticisms, and misunderstand the state of serious thinking. To put it bluntly, too many viewers just stayed at the level of watching the plot, which also created the farce that "Donkey Gets Water" can be ranked first in the annual reputation list. ii. This movie is not promoting success learning! This is obvious. Those who praise the heroine for a clear goal, abiding by the contract, and professionalism are really a bit suspicious of being overwhelmed by the cold reality of the utilitarian society. With so many comments and short comments, the friends who wrote "I was hired to win" on the notebook are far away. Madden is a director who follows the theater tradition very much, so the film is very neat, and the title emphasizes "A conviction lobbist CAN' so many times." In my eyes, the film is about faith, with two theme lines: one is faith greater than personal sacrifice; the other is the salvation of human awakening. Together, it is actually a question of Christian faith, unconditional faith. Sloan saved such a big game not to win some gun control bill, but to resist a mechanical democratic machine that was invaded by parasites and deteriorated. In fact, since she began to refute the constitution, it was revealed that its purpose is not only to win one. Lobbying is so simple. She supported the gun control bill because it was in line with her morals. From the very beginning, she decided to expose her past crimes and to get the officials down. From the perspective of the play, there are such instructions everywhere. Another point is that the film has never given Sloan’s motivation as a utilitarian to take up the case, nor has it tried to resolve this contradiction, because it is just a fake. Contradiction, the starting point of her reorganization process is not selfish. The other line is redemption: she is mean to others and hurts others without mercy, but on the way to complete the "big move", under the "on-demand" of the PR guy and others, Sloan understands the value of humanity and regains humanity. While accomplishing great justice, it also realizes personal salvation. In cooperation, there are also "academic girls" who give up utilitarianism and go back to "academic"; "spy girls" are weak in mind and betrayed, remorse, and punished after being deceived; public relations men respect their identity and refuse to betray the Sloan who reveals his true temperament ( In fact, this duck exists as the moral model of the film, and tells a lot of truth); the "skeptical" woman doubts, entangles, and finally understands Sloan Yunyun. All of these can actually be attributed to the promotion of Christian goodness and unconditional faith. The whole story is the evolutionary process of Sloan tearing off Satan's face and letting Jesus in his body come out. 3. This is the subject-related and the indignation over the indignation of comments on the Internet. Just a few words about the technical advantages and disadvantages of the film: Advantages: It is really neat, very particular, regardless of the drama, editing, camera language, super stable, For example, two scenes using natural light in the airport and prison are very beautiful in language and composition. In fact, my understanding of techniques is very superficial. Maybe I have time later. Maybe someone reads this article and wants to continue discussing it. I can try to make another game. Every action and look are serving the story and characters, helping to solve problems, and never waste. Disadvantages: too dramatic (I think this is insufficient for the time being). This is combined with some of my prejudices about this old-school British director. Like many British films, they are well-crafted and neat, but they inevitably make people feel a bit of a routine, which weakens the power of criticism and thinking. More ups and downs, reverse flashbacks will make the story better, and it will also slightly increase the commerciality, so there are even a lot of misleading "feints" in the film, such as repeated hints of the "skeptical" woman's vacillation, deliberately slightly The mental journey directly shows Sloan's desperate performance of losing control of the situation (crash scene, depressed expression at the airport), etc., so that the audience's attention is drawn away by the story, and it is difficult to have a chance to be separated. The above shortcomings that I personally think, or the reasons for limiting the height of the film, can be attributed to the idea that is too classic and straightforward. Okay, just say this, I am also an impetuous person now, and being able to sit down and write so much is the limit tonight. In fact, I am quite superficial in all aspects of my knowledge, and I only talk about some personal opinions. If someone sees it, I will criticize what I like or dislike as much as possible. Maybe I still want to improve my interpretation and analysis of the film when I have time. ~~
View more about Miss Sloane reviews
