Pure science fiction and reasoning fan background, I have seen only a handful of fanfic, I am very emotional after reading it after the recommendation of my best friend of senior two (l) times (s) ape (p), so this analysis has a layman's subjectivity
1. Setting analysis: The whole play provides three ways to remove the working girl’s time machine to change the world line: 1. d mail method, this method may touch a certain node of the time branch, and then violate the law of causality, but there is no time The mobility of the traveler himself 2. The time leap method, the mobility of someone, strictly speaking, is not time travel, but memory transfer (this point is quite brilliant), but it leads to the giant (xuan) pit (xue) of reading stainer To be filled, this point is a logical loophole and it is a pity to leave it to the next season. 3. "Deception", the conclusion of the two episodes of nuclear tricks is completed. The following three settings are evaluated: 1. The first two methods are based on a beautiful world The setting of Harness can be said to be quite beautiful. This is the biggest highlight of the first 19 episodes. The beauty of this setting is that it indirectly acknowledges the "law of time-space causality", that is, time travel itself cannot change time. The fundamental result is logical and perceptual cognition. Otherwise, there is no possibility of traditional time-space travel in reality (our fragile time-space results may have been changed tens of thousands of times by future descendants) 2. "Deception" The setting is based on the observer setting of quantum space-time, which is completely in line with the space-time cognition of contemporary physics (there is no end to things, quantum mechanics??? I say that I am an expert), from the perspective of a science fiction fan, to be honest It's not new. Anyone who is new to science fiction will be amazed when they watch the ending observer setting of Da Liu's "Ball Lightning" for the first time, but the point of falsifying the observation results is really wonderful, the key to causality One of the links is Okabe himself, I have already guessed it, but the 24th episode turned the tide with "deception". I really didn't expect it
2. Character building and plot evaluation: 1. Okabe's regular middle 2 blood, no evaluation of highlight buff settings at critical moments, basically qualified 2. Makase is a bit inferior to tell the truth, maybe my expectations for her are too high, except The shape setting is relatively good (I didn't watch this drama, I liked this image very much), I think the character is not full enough, and it's a bit facial? There are contradictions in the character settings. You are a high-IQ and protagonist, but at important plot points, you are more of Okabe's "accompaniment", lacking the kind of active highlight operation that does not lose to the male protagonist; the emotional line is also quite For disappointment, the foreshadowing is superficial and insufficient (strictly speaking, the early slapstick and jealousy in the Liuhuajiang episode are unqualified foreshadowing), the dog food episode is a bit rude, the author has sprinkled dogs for emotional lines Suspicion of food, very stiff, not natural enough? (Or did I start from the emotional drama standard of literary films and stand on the "emotional commanding heights"?) 3. Mayuri I want to give high marks, the modeling is relatively successful, and the character setting may not be impressive (clannad characters of the same type) Shaping can be hung), but the character has a strong three-dimensional sense, and the "matching" actions (dudulu and stardust shake hand) and shape settings are perfect for character shaping. 4. The barrel is qualified, and the overall design of a supporting role is quite impressive. 5 .Here, I would like to mention Mr. Kinescope and Dr. Zhongbo. What these two characters have in common is that they get full marks for the unexpected setting of the plot, and zero points for the characterization. Yes, 24 episodes are too short and not enough to shape. It can also be reserved for the next season, I can understand, but the image of the doctor in the last episode is simply facial, and the tool is to the extreme. There is no depth and no soul. You can imagine that the heroine's father is so unnaturally black. Is it childish and childish? I'm disappointed because I've always been against the profiling of villains, very, very much, and noble art uses depth to give villains and every supporting role the highest dignity (The Dark Knight's Joker)
The plot line can only be qualified except for the unexpected, and the emotional line cannot pass. I think it is awkward and nonsensical. It is water time to sprinkle dog food (you can hang the pig head), I don't know if there is any analysis of the theme. Necessary, because for a series, the theme of saving the world is very common, and the theme is friendship, family and love. There is no need to ask too much, but given its excellent world view setting Find some more glitches in the theme and the depth of characterization (for example, the three-body true love fans are really heartbroken about the face-masking of Da Liu's characters, and they keep it a secret ╯﹏╰ ah ah ah)
View more about Steins;Gate reviews
