I don't want to say that either... How much you love "ida", how much disappointment "cold wat" will bring... "ida" affects my artistic vision, and its narrative composition can be described as long and refined! The director continued to use the form of the previous work this time, seeking to be minimal but empty. There is no love, no characters, no smoke... just leave the 4:3 aspect ratio, and hastily 1. Form and composition: When you abandon 16:9 and use 4:3, it means that all elements of the picture have been carefully considered "ida" "The whole film photography includes the negative space of characters and metaphors, and strives to be concise. "Cold war" instead puts more elements in it. The protagonist is at the bottom and the supporting characters are in the upper middle position. The vision is really very chaotic. Fixing the mirror makes no scenes look like exquisite photography works, but "cold war" increases the hand-held, follow-up, surround, and panning to destroy the flatness of the 4:3 frame. Several scenes are really bad. As for aerial photography, it is a personal aesthetic problem. "ida" is a movie with faith, so the overhead shot can be interpreted as the perspective of God Too fast, the composition and message cannot be received, and the cut is too short, so don't do it : The best director representation of Cannes is superior to others... I'm really looking forward to this film! But the fall was too heavy, and the fall was injured...
View more about Cold War reviews