A beautiful and profound play, it is difficult to dare to speak to Marquis de Sade if it is not profound. As far as erotic-themed films are concerned, this one is unbelievably clean, and even after watching it, you will have no impression of eroticism at all.
Then this is not a biography, not a biography, not a biography, it is a fan novel with Sade and his lover Madeleine as the protagonists, so it is meaningless to entangle Sade's own three views in this film. view, and how far the screenwriter's Sade is from the real Sade. The screenwriter's three views are very straightforward. If you want to know the good, you must know the evil, and the words will not hurt the person's actions. Therefore, Sade's book makes people know evil, and it is the reader's choice whether to do evil or not. And Sade in the screenwriter's pen is too intoxicated and regards himself as a character in the book, which basically belongs to the debauchery of speech and the integrity of the heart, and is also a martyr who devotes himself to freedom. The real Sade... is definitely not as great as the movie...
Because it was adapted from a play, the film was a bit too dramatic. The Dean was destroyed by Thad in the three views in the play, but his image was too weak. In every confrontation with Thad, he was destroyed to the point where there was no slag left, and he was a little restrained. Is it not good. Madeleine is a bug. The laundress in the lunatic asylum is the most sober and righteous person in the show, and it may be less awkward to use narration. And the villain is too bad to be too simple and straightforward to concentrate all the slots.
Uncle Rush is crazy, like a big gray moth, flying around, slightly annoying, but harmless, the only thing he can do is to give birth to thousands of small moths. Every time I am moved by Uncle Rush's precise performance, I beg the years to show mercy to Uncle.
View more about Quills reviews
