From the perspective of first-person storytelling, the audience is directly dragged into the world of the protagonist of hackers and criminals. The relatively smooth plot makes the whole film qualified for viewing. The most striking thing is the double reversal at the end, and the interval is very short. The conclusion that the audience had just established, suddenly realized and deeply believed to be true was destroyed in less than 10 minutes, and then the powerful secondary subversion can still justify itself. Just in the two completely contradictory reasoning, the film force suddenly rose a rank! The director is like a criminal who is taller than the demon in the film, making full use of the weakness of human nature, turning his hands into clouds and covering his hands into rain, playing with the audience in the palm of his hand. Seeing the ending has a sense of sight of "The Very Suspect". The male protagonist is playing a big game of chess, and the paving is not leaking. It's just that my head hurts. The technology in the information age is getting more and more advanced, but the sense of security is getting weaker. The world of hackers is not something that ordinary people like us can understand. . With the help of the movie, I can still feel the sense of crisis. The more developed it is, the more unsafe it is. It may be thought-provoking: Is it cost-effective or loss-making to exchange personal privacy for high-tech?
View more about Who Am I reviews
