It is too difficult for people with severe choice phobia to choose a movie to watch, so I like Baidu Cloud's small plane very much. Recently, I just watch which movie I hit. It's simple and convenient, and what everyone throws out is usually the Internet Disk collection is more reliable.
I accidentally watched "Who Am I: There Is No Absolute Security System". In fact, I have seen the introduction before. When Benjamin used sugar cube magic to negotiate a deal with Hannah, he guessed that everything was a routine, and the screenwriter was going to play the reverse Well, in fact, if you watch these kinds of films more, you will probably understand the direction. The second half is mainly to see how the screenwriter makes sense of the rhythm. Although the reversal can make people look very cool, it also tests the director's skills. The atmosphere and rhythm are foreshadowed in the early stage, so that the audience should feel that it is not right to leave inadvertent little clues, but they can't guess the answer. Badly filmed reversals abound, and there are generally two types of problems. The first is that the foreshadowing is not enough. A lot of accidental events that are purely coincidental. The reversal is very blunt, and the reversal is reversed for the sake of reversal, which is more common in many domestic films. In fact, the so-called reversal, no matter how good or bad the filming is, is some kind of routine. For example, a man fell in love with a woman and gave birth to a child. Finally, he found out that his lover was his long-lost daughter. If the filming is bad, it is super ridiculous and unethical. The good thing is that Oedipus-esque tragedies are shocking, like Old Boy and Scorched Earth. The second is that the answer is too easy for the audience to guess. The audience hates the director to think of himself as a fool, but some directors are afraid that the audience can't understand it, and make crazy hints. Too simple a reversal that is seen through by the audience is meaningless. If you know the answer and then watch a series of foreshadowing coincidences in the plot, it will be very boring, so everyone will especially hate spoilers. But the second situation is sometimes different from person to person, and each person’s viewing volume is different, and the size of their brain hole is different. Some people may find it boring if they can guess it, and some people think it’s too reversed if they can’t guess it. Great looking. Therefore, people with big brains who watch a lot of movies can easily guess some routines, and they will not be particularly interested in watching many movies. Humans have limited brains. In fact, they all learn from each other. The history of film has more than 100 years, and the history of literary creation is even longer. All routines can actually see the shadow of their predecessors. Twins, time-travel, multiple personalities, cyclic repetition, and even sci-fi replicas, people who died in the early stage reappeared at a critical moment, that's about it.
For "Who Am I", I think the materialization of the virtual network is very good, and the action shots are very good. But the final reversal was badly shot, which is the second problem, too easy to be guessed. But it doesn't matter if you guessed it, the decryption process will also be good, but the rhythm is very poor, the pre-narrative is too long, and the reading is very tired. Only the last ten minutes are left to overthrow the pre-architecture and push it to a climax, but the time is too short and it is not enough. Burning, Hannah finds that Benjamin is a multiple personality. This part can be shot better. The second reversal gave less time and less fun. As the master said, the audience can see the bomb under the table, but the protagonist does not know that he is still calm, then the audience will be nervous, and finally someone finds that the bomb is thrown out of the window and the bomb explodes, and the audience will Very cool. Now it is equivalent to the audience watching the protagonist play cards for an hour and a half, and also guessed that they will not be killed by the explosion, and they are not nervous about the protagonist at all, so it is not very pleasant that there is a reversal later. I vaguely remember that when I saw a movie recommendation before, I described this movie as saying that the final five minutes of the big reversal will not be able to guess the ending. I am generally more wary of movies with such descriptions. There are really movies that can be in Whether the last few minutes perfectly overturn the previous structure gives a good reversal, this is debatable. First of all, for such a long period of time in the early stage, it is necessary to keep the audience curious and interested in the answer, and they cannot guess the final ending. Second, the reversal is not a click and turns, and there needs to be a foreshadowing and a decryption process, although generally a quick cut will look very cool. , but it takes several pushes to finally push to the climax and detonate. I think it takes about ten to twenty minutes to shake off the burden of the early stage. Only the reversal in the last five minutes is best to leave some clues for infinite aftertaste and guess slowly. The second reversal of "Who Am I" can completely make the four people reunite to look at each other and smile, and it's a bit boring to talk a lot at the end.
I used to like to watch drama and crime movies, but after watching it a lot, I can guess it, so I don’t have that much interest. Now I like anti-routine routines, like “The Cabin in the Woods”, or although there are reverse routines, but Not entirely driven by this narrative, like The Grand Budapest Hotel.
It doesn't matter how you explain the ending of "Who Am I", it doesn't matter if there are bugs or not. I always watch movies and just watch the feeling. It's fine if the screenwriter can justify it, but the director's rhythm is average, so I can only give it to Samsung.
View more about Who Am I reviews
