The first half an hour is at normal speed, and the latter is at 1.25 times. This is my first double speed movie.
The director, after giving the protagonists high computer intelligence, uses their low emotional intelligence as a trigger to tell the whole story.
"You are the kind of person who complains that fate is unfair to you all the time, always feels that you are not welcome, you are a social scum, no one even beats you in school, because no one is interested in you, you are a big tragedy You know what I think? You're just a piece of trash." Max's comments on the protagonist at the beginning of the play. With one hit, the protagonist is really excited, and then step by step toward the hacker road.
But it is also Max's evaluation: "Don't be so naive, without us, you are nothing." The protagonist is stimulated again, and fate ushered in another turning point, which is also a turning point in the plot.
At the beginning of the film, the protagonist compares himself with Spider-Man, Batman and Superman, thinking that he also has the prerequisites for being a hero, which is a tragic family: his father fled to France, his mother committed suicide, his grandmother suffers from Alzheimer's disease, and he is in a tragic family. Computer skills. But he also knew that there are thousands of talents with computer skills, and only the top ones can become heroes. This also happened to set the stage for the subsequent plot change of the film, becoming a hacker, showing love to the beloved girl, and paving the way for the MRX demonstration.
The trend of the plot is relatively simple. In the films of the past few years, the reversal of the film at the end of the film is actually mediocre, and it does not give me a feeling of surprise. The social engineering that the whole article talks about, in addition to the weakness of the protagonist to change his personality, is to point out the theme, and human beings are the biggest bug. However, in order to capture the beauty of social engineering, the director lowered the IQ level of the characters in the play. Sensibility is the biggest factor for human beings to act as security bugs, but human willpower and human professionalism will not allow such flaws to occur in the most rigorous and safe places. In order to achieve the protagonist, in order to respond to the theme, human beings were photographed procedurally and emotionally. Perhaps only such a supporting role can allow the naive protagonist to find an opportunity. But this is too small to look down on human beings.
Only a strong opponent can bring out the strength of the protagonist. In this film, the director let the protagonist with a young emotional intelligence play a group of people who work in sensitive institutions and are different from the general public. And this is not a hacker's technology, but a so-called social engineering, commonly known as playing emotional cards, such a way of gambling.
"If life gives you a lemon, then you have to mix your own salt and dragon seltzer." "You can win if you dare to do it." Chicken soup for the soul appears bluntly many times in the film and is spoken by several vulgar characters, all for the sake of Educate the protagonist and let the protagonist grow. But I can't see any growth. The so-called growth of the protagonist: "You can win if you dare to do it" is actually a scene directed by being stimulated to prove his childish behavior.
I don't see any charm in such a protagonist, it's just that the diaosi we know every day want to counterattack but do unrealistic and childish actions, just wearing a hacker's vest. Fortunately, they had low-energy supporting roles, so they directed a big play for their own amusement.
View more about Who Am I reviews
